2012 London Olympics - Page 16

Cannabis Schizophrenia relation


Hi there Dsmarts

On May 09 2012 02:31 D_smart_S wrote: Research the 13 bloodlines of the Illuminati. The thing is that by digging deeper you would encounter much more crazy facts about those fuckers and I won't talk about those here. The rabbit hole is enormous and is entangled with everything else - ancient history, spiritualism, Ufos (rofl omg he said UFOs, he doesn't know the Earth is flat and we are the only ones in the billion trillions of planets) and so much more.

Can you please provide the names of these 13 Families and Birth and Death Dates of the founding Members of those families? Is it your opinion that Caroll Quigley has more accurate writing or should I spend more time reading the works of people like Fritz Springmeier?

No, I won't bother providing anything for you because you are not interested enough to find anything yourself. And I don't give two craps about Quigley or Migley.

On May 09 2012 09:35 palak wrote: Show nested quote + simply the government creating an attack to justify an invasion that would have never been aproved without it, i assume u mean Iraq since Afghanistan is rarely talked about. Although Afghanistan is due solely to 9/11, Iraq isnt. It is quite probable America would have invaded under Bush anywaay.   Seven months prior to the September 11 attacks a Gallup poll showed that 52% would favor an invasion of Iraq while 42% would oppose it.[4] Additionally, 64% said that the U.S. should have removed Saddam at the end of the Gulf War.[5] [edit] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Popular_...United_States_on_the_invasion_of_Iraq if you follow the wiki source the same poll was in the mid 50s all 2002 and 64% pre invasion. Not exactly a massive surge and not large enough to cause a voter swing. Plus if the US gov't wanted to do a false flag attacking the WTC towers makes no sense in the first place and since there was already majority support for an invasion pre 9/11 demolishing the towers makes no sense even if u were to attack them. If the gov't particularly conservatives (all ran the gov't at the time sooo assumed masterminds bu conspiracy ppl) you would attack gov't and historical landmarks. Statue of liberty, white house, federal mall, capitol building, independence hall, etc. An attack on those would inspire more of a patriotic effect and have a more lasting impact than destroying the towers did. Plus there is the added bonus of those attacks not fucking up our financial markets. Plus for a political and economic game indepence hall makes far more sense. It is our oldest and probably most internally glorified building, it wouldnt effect economics as much, and its in Philly which would mean if the attack swung Philly dems or independents to the right Pennsylvania would become a fairly solid red state in elections which would give a huge conservative edge in elections.

i'd also like to add that comparing 9/11 to acts such as the reichstag fire is stretching it (i'm assuming that's what baal means since he used that example in a previous thread). reichstag fire only needed a few people to be in on it-and it required very little effort. 9/11 would have needed many many people to be in on it, osama bin laden, people in airline companies, and the people who would have spent a looong time putting explosives in the tower which also would have to have gone undetected. The chance of a leak would be huge.

On May 09 2012 14:27 D_smart_S wrote: No, I won't bother providing anything for you because you are not interested enough to find anything yourself. And I don't give two craps about Quigley or Migley.

Carroll Quigley is the author of Tragedy and Hope, he was a modern conspiracy theorist and American History Professor at Georgetown University. Fritz Springmeier is the author of Bloodlines of the Illuminati. Carroll Quigley's Tragedy and Hope is where most of the ideas you are proposing come from. So have you actually done an intensive research into this topic? It really seems like you haven't so how can you even make predictions or present your argument to other people.


Poll: Predictions for 2012 Olympics
(Vote): A Jamaican wins the 100m Men
(Vote): D_Smart_S predictions come true and a NWO is established
(Vote): We all become dumber from reading this thread

I GOT IT

D_Smart is one of the Illuminati's puppets and he tries to convince us into his theories, so that we deny them and just sit peacefully in our homes waiting for the inevitable.
And then... BOOM!

Nice try, D.

Farmmylife, i just don't know this one guy, I can't know every connection. And the "ideas" don't come from anyone but from the truth.

On May 09 2012 02:31 D_smart_S wrote: So you believe in secret societies and know that governments are behind the false flags but you don't connect them? From your posts I conclude that you think they exist simultaneously but not together and the secret societies have no involvment in 9/11 and stuff like that? That's pretty strange. How can you know about secret societies without knowing they are part of the government. They are the governments for the most part. All the foreign policies come from them. The CFR... that's the fucking Illuminati, dude - Rockefeller... Just dig deeper. If you wanted more control and power would you stay away from governmental positions. No. You infiltrate them. You become the government and thus - invinsible. Otherwise they would be easy pray. That's why they don't give a damn fuck about some conspiracy theorists knowing their plans. It doesn't matter to them. They would still happen, people would still be easy to manipulate and nobody would be able to arrest them because they are THE SYSTEM itself. You have only scratched the surface, there is so much more. Research the 13 bloodlines of the Illuminati. The thing is that by digging deeper you would encounter much more crazy facts about those fuckers and I won't talk about those here. The rabbit hole is enormous and is entangled with everything else - ancient history, spiritualism, Ufos (rofl omg he said UFOs, he doesn't know the Earth is flat and we are the only ones in the billion trillions of planets) and so much more.

I never said they are not involved, the rockefellers, merryl and lynch, morgans etc they are very powerful people involved in secret societies, but one thing is that they are involved in the demollition of 2 towers for profit and another is that they have absolute dominion and control over things and are giving random clues in movies, that makes no sense.

Also when you talk about UFOs and spiritualism and the soul you have 0 credibility to me at least.

On May 09 2012 08:43 Stroggoz wrote: Show nested quote + On May 08 2012 18:30 Baalim wrote:   On May 08 2012 17:50 tloapc wrote: hey Baal are u still an anarchist or did u conform into something else? I'm thinking about replying to your posts in the prisoners dilemma thread but I dno't wanna ruin the giggles I currently have merely by observing also I wonder where u fit 9/11 into the second half of those conclusions "Every nation, in every region, now has a decision to make. Either you are with us or with the terrorist" -George Bush Yes i am still an anarchist and i dont think ill stop being one ever, its kind of like becoming an atheist, you reach a point of awareness where you consider the Satus Quo borderline insane. I believe 9/11 was an inside Job after seeing all the past, (absolute fact that this has been done multiple times by governments) and the evidence i think its the most likely scenario, Palak has provided strong counter-evidence like that train gear wheel which leaves me puzzles but i still think the evidence for demolition is stronger, i might be wrong but if you werent at least very curious and have serious doubts abut it you are an indocrinated idiot. I dont think it was the illuminati or anything with those paranoid 9/11 references in the matrix lol, simply the government creating an attack to justify an invasion that would have never been aproved without it, it wasnt a mastermind perfect job, it was quite a sloppy (WTC 7 for example) and thats why the conspiracy theory has so many advocates, i remember that something like 40%+ of americans believed the government was involved in some way. To me D_Smart is just as stupid as the guy who thinks killing and capturing the most elusive man in modern history (Osama) and tossing his body into the sea with no proof isnt fishy. i'm sure 40% of america's population are experts in physics and engineering as well as you baal.

Its not like i ever used an amount of people believing in something like it has weight afterall, an alike percentage of americans dont believe in evolution and the world is like 90% religious however its by far the biggest % of population that believes in a conspiracy theory, so you dont get to sort it along with moon landing conspiracies and that ridiculous bullshit only a handful of nutjobs believe.

If you are interested i can provide you many links, a team of Structural engeneers and architects explaining why it was a demolition, or even the architect himself saying how it was built to support that impact etc, but lets not get into 9/11 it has been discussed ad naseum, believe what you want.

its by far the biggest % of population that believes in a conspiracy theory,

No, that would be JFK assassination

even the architect himself saying how it was built to support that impact

The head architect who designed the WTCs? I will bet you anything that the man who designed the WTC towers has nothing to say on whether or not they were able to withstand the impact of a 767 nor has any quotes as to his thoughts on 9/11.

a team of Structural engeneers and architects explaining why it was a demolition

I can provide you a team of molecular biologists and scientists explaining why evolution is false

On May 09 2012 18:55 Baalim wrote: Show nested quote + On May 09 2012 08:43 Stroggoz wrote:   On May 08 2012 18:30 Baalim wrote:   On May 08 2012 17:50 tloapc wrote: hey Baal are u still an anarchist or did u conform into something else? I'm thinking about replying to your posts in the prisoners dilemma thread but I dno't wanna ruin the giggles I currently have merely by observing also I wonder where u fit 9/11 into the second half of those conclusions "Every nation, in every region, now has a decision to make. Either you are with us or with the terrorist" -George Bush Yes i am still an anarchist and i dont think ill stop being one ever, its kind of like becoming an atheist, you reach a point of awareness where you consider the Satus Quo borderline insane. I believe 9/11 was an inside Job after seeing all the past, (absolute fact that this has been done multiple times by governments) and the evidence i think its the most likely scenario, Palak has provided strong counter-evidence like that train gear wheel which leaves me puzzles but i still think the evidence for demolition is stronger, i might be wrong but if you werent at least very curious and have serious doubts abut it you are an indocrinated idiot. I dont think it was the illuminati or anything with those paranoid 9/11 references in the matrix lol, simply the government creating an attack to justify an invasion that would have never been aproved without it, it wasnt a mastermind perfect job, it was quite a sloppy (WTC 7 for example) and thats why the conspiracy theory has so many advocates, i remember that something like 40%+ of americans believed the government was involved in some way. To me D_Smart is just as stupid as the guy who thinks killing and capturing the most elusive man in modern history (Osama) and tossing his body into the sea with no proof isnt fishy. i'm sure 40% of america's population are experts in physics and engineering as well as you baal. Its not like i ever used an amount of people believing in something like it has weight afterall, an alike percentage of americans dont believe in evolution and the world is like 90% religious however its by far the biggest % of population that believes in a conspiracy theory, so you dont get to sort it along with moon landing conspiracies and that ridiculous bullshit only a handful of nutjobs believe. If you are interested i can provide you many links, a team of Structural engeneers and architects explaining why it was a demolition, or even the architect himself saying how it was built to support that impact etc, but lets not get into 9/11 it has been discussed ad naseum, believe what you want.

quite honestly, this and the stuff on JFK would be interesting to read

I also call total bullshit and want to see the poll saying 40% of americans think 9/11 was a demolision, ive never seen a poll having that high a number ever

Ive been part of a secret society for about 10 years now.

On May 09 2012 21:58 casinocasino wrote: Ive been part of a secret society for about 10 years now.

You mean the AA?

On May 09 2012 20:07 palak wrote: Show nested quote + its by far the biggest % of population that believes in a conspiracy theory, No, that would be JFK assassination   even the architect himself saying how it was built to support that impact The head architect who designed the WTCs? I will bet you anything that the man who designed the WTC towers has nothing to say on whether or not they were able to withstand the impact of a 767 nor has any quotes as to his thoughts on 9/11.   a team of Structural engeneers and architects explaining why it was a demolition I can provide you a team of molecular biologists and scientists explaining why evolution is false

show me one that is an atheist and im interested, wont get into 911 with you again, we have done it long enough, let it go.

On May 09 2012 20:29 palak wrote: I also call total bullshit and want to see the poll saying 40% of americans think 9/11 was a demolision, ive never seen a poll having that high a number ever

Zogby
The polls that have received the most widespread media attention are those conducted by Zogby International. The Zogby polls have been sponsored by organizations within the 9/11 Truth Movement including 911truth.org.
The first one was conducted in August 2004, on the eve of a Republican National Convention, on 808 randomly-selected residents of New York State. It found that 49 percent of New York City residents and 41 percent of New York state citizens believe individuals within the US government "knew in advance that attacks were planned on or around September 11, 2001, and that they consciously failed to act".[4] The margin of error for this poll was 3.5 percent.
The second major Zogby poll on 9/11 was conducted in May 2006. It was a telephone interview of 1,200 randomly-selected adults from across the United States, consisting of 81 questions, with a 2.9 percent margin of error.[5] Some of the questions asked include the following:
"Some people believe that the US government and its 9/11 Commission concealed or refused to investigate critical evidence that contradicts their official explanation of the September 11th attacks, saying there has been a cover-up. Others say that the 9/11 Commission was a bi-partisan group of honest and well-respected people and that there is no reason they would want to cover-up anything. Who are you more likely to agree with?"
Responses: 48% No Cover-up / 42% Cover-up / 10% Not sure
"World Trade Center Building 7 is the 47-story skyscraper that was not hit by any planes during the September 11th attacks, but still totally collapsed later the same day. This collapse was not investigated by the 9/11 Commission. Are you aware of this skyscraper's collapse, and if so do you believe that the Commission should have also investigated it? Or do you believe that the Commission was right to only investigate the collapse of the buildings which were directly hit by airplanes?"
Responses: 43% Not Aware / 38% Aware - should have investigated it / 14% Aware - right not to investigate it / 5% Not Sure
"Some people say that so many unanswered questions about 9/11 remain that Congress or an International Tribunal should re-investigate the attacks, including whether any US government officials consciously allowed or helped facilitate their success. Other people say the 9/11 attacks were thoroughly investigated and that any speculation about US government involvement is nonsense. Who are you more likely to agree with?"
Responses: 47% Attacks were thoroughly investigated / 45% Reinvestigate the attacks / 8% Not Sure
The third major Zogby poll regarding 9/11 was conducted in August 2007. It was a telephone interview with a target of 1,000 interviews with randomly-selected adults from across the United States, consisting of 71 questions, with a 3.1 percent margin of error.[6]
The results of the 2007 August poll indicate that 51% of Americans want Congress to probe Bush/Cheney regarding the 9/11 attacks and over 30% of those polled seek immediate impeachment. While only 32% seek immediate Bush and/or Cheney impeachment based on their personal knowledge, many citizens appear eager for clear exposure of the facts.
In addition, the poll also found that two-thirds (67%) of Americans say the 9/11 Commission should have investigated the collapse of World Trade Center Building 7. Only 4.8 percent of the respondents agreed that members of the United States government "actively planned or assisted some aspects of the attack."

It is easier to just post the link to the wikipedia article : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opinion_polls_about_9/11_conspiracy_theories

1. Sponsered by 9/11 truth movement sooo likely biased.
2. Ignoring pt 1. Nothing in there says 40% demolition

"knew in advance that attacks were planned on or around September 11, 2001, and that they consciously failed to act"

doesnt mean they think they destroyed the towers, just means they didnt act on evidence they were given. Also note that the question comes from a survey that was given only to people that live in new york state, not the entire US

"Some people believe that the US government and its 9/11 Commission concealed or refused to investigate critical evidence that contradicts their official explanation of the September 11th attacks, saying there has been a cover-up. Others say that the 9/11 Commission was a bi-partisan group of honest and well-respected people and that there is no reason they would want to cover-up anything. Who are you more likely to agree with?"

cover up does not mean they think it was a planned demolition.

"actively planned or assisted some aspects of the attack."

this still doesnt mean demolition but it is closer. But thats only 4.8% saying yes. The scripts howard poll has it as 6% saying very likely they were demolished, 10% say somewhat likely

6-15% think 9/11 was a demolition, people that say thereee is cover up do not all think it was a demolition and do not get counted in that group. For reference, between 6-20% of Americans think the moon landings were hoaxed http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moon_landing_conspiracy_theories
So I have no problem putting people who think 9/11 was a planned demolition into the same nutjob group as ppl who think we faked the moon landing

I'll work on finding an atheist who thinks evolution is wrong.

On May 09 2012 14:27 D_smart_S wrote: No, I won't bother providing anything for you because you are not interested enough to find anything yourself.

Saying this after urging caution in the most important thread you will ever write is a bit weird isnt it? I though it was extremely important for you to convince ppl not to go to the olympics yet when someone asks why you tell them to figure it out themselves.

lol, I am not spoonfeeding anyone here. People who are interested or will go to the Olympics have everything they would want to learn in this thread. I have put links to documentaries that explain further. That's enough information but I ain't doing research for a lazy troll.