2012 London Olympics - Page 11

On May 04 2012 04:52 D_smart_S wrote: You really don't get the goal of the thread and don't read/understand what I write. Read my last post, I am done replying to people who want me to bet money on people dying and don't understand why I am not doing it or people who can't understand that by saying "these are clues" I mean "this is evidence". Seriously, just learn to understand what is written before posting anything, zeppy. It's like I am pointing at a bird and saying "hey that's a bird" and someone replies "it's not a plane, idiot, why do you think it's a plane? Prove it!"

LOLOLOL speculated symbolical images/subliminal messages are not empirical evidence you fucking moron. Do you really not understand that? Neither is posting 1000 youtube videos. Post REFERENCES. Have you ever been on wikipedia, read a book, or seen palak make an argument? The matrix pic is prime example of what I'm talking about. You say look at this "evidence", when come to find out that "evidence" is completely distorted. You don't even take the time to research what you present as evidence. You see it on youtube and say, it must be true because 10 people fucking said it. That's not how the scientific method works you fucking schizophrenic idiot.

On May 04 2012 05:02 Zep wrote: Show nested quote + On May 04 2012 04:52 D_smart_S wrote: I am done replying to people who can't understand that by saying "these are clues" I don't mean "this is evidence". LOLOLOL symbolical messages are not empirical evidence you fucking moron.You say look at this EVIDENCE

On May 04 2012 05:12 D_smart_S wrote: Show nested quote + On May 04 2012 05:02 Zep wrote:   On May 04 2012 04:52 D_smart_S wrote: I am done replying to people who can't understand that by saying "these are clues" I mean "this is evidence". LOLOLOL symbolical messages are not empirical evidence you fucking moron.You say look at this EVIDENCE

I love how you quote me out of context and delete the rest of what I said.

k whatever. The whole point is I am writing this thread as a compilation of CLUES, not EVIDENCE because many people would be in the games so they might want to take them into consideration cause it's their life. If you have a problem with me warning people of a POSSIBLE danger then go fingerf*** yourself. Should I wait till I get my hands on a document saying "we are the illuminati and we will attack the 2012 Olympics" with Obama's sign and seal or do I share the information and let everyone decide? You act like you are in the kindergarden.

And I am high so I can't be too accurate in my words so no word-police po-lease.

On May 04 2012 04:52 D_smart_S wrote: You really don't get the goal of the thread and don't read/understand what I write.

I've literally read every word you've written and I don't buy your argument.

What is your goal of this thread? To prove you're the biggest schizophrenic asshole on this site? Yeah we already know that...

On May 04 2012 05:24 D_smart_S wrote: k whatever. The whole point is I am writing this thread as a compilation of CLUES, not EVIDENCE because many people would be in the games so they might want to take them into consideration cause it's their life. If you have a problem with me warning people of a POSSIBLE danger then go fingerf*** yourself.

I love how you say I don't read anything you write when 8 posts ago in post 198 (not to mention post 12 as well) I clearly state NO ONE WHO IS IN POSSIBLE DANGER OF AN ATTACK LISTENS TO YOU.
You're preaching to a room full of people who are chomping their lips at the opportunity to flame the shit out of you. So please, keep up the disrespect and speculation. Like I stated before, I can't wait til August 13th.

okay. Thank you. We agree to disagree. Now please buy a ticket to the Olympics and stop bumping a thread you don't like. When you return from England we will talk again. Cya.

On May 04 2012 04:52 D_smart_S wrote: You really don't get the goal of the thread and don't read/understand what I write. Read my last post, I am done replying to people who want me to bet money on people dying and don't understand why I am not doing it or people who can't understand that by saying "these are clues" I don't mean "this is evidence". Seriously, just learn to understand what is written before posting anything, zeppy. It's like I am pointing at a bird and saying "hey that's a bird" and someone replies "it's not a plane, idiot, why do you think it's a plane? Prove it!"

"Stop asking for evidence and just take my word for that everything i say is true. If you do, all these clues will make perfect sense"

On May 04 2012 05:24 D_smart_S wrote: k whatever. The whole point is I am writing this thread as a compilation of CLUES, not EVIDENCE because many people would be in the games so they might want to take them into consideration cause it's their life.

This is like saying that you had a dream where the olympics was bombed and because of that ppl shouldnt go.

On May 04 2012 05:02 Zep wrote: Show nested quote + On May 04 2012 04:52 D_smart_S wrote: You really don't get the goal of the thread and don't read/understand what I write. Read my last post, I am done replying to people who want me to bet money on people dying and don't understand why I am not doing it or people who can't understand that by saying "these are clues" I mean "this is evidence". Seriously, just learn to understand what is written before posting anything, zeppy. It's like I am pointing at a bird and saying "hey that's a bird" and someone replies "it's not a plane, idiot, why do you think it's a plane? Prove it!" LOLOLOL speculated symbolical images/subliminal messages are not empirical evidence you fucking moron. Do you really not understand that? Neither is posting 1000 youtube videos. Post REFERENCES. Have you ever been on wikipedia, read a book, or seen palak make an argument? The matrix pic is prime example of what I'm talking about. You say look at this "evidence", when come to find out that "evidence" is completely distorted. You don't even take the time to research what you present as evidence. You see it on youtube and say, it must be true because 10 people fucking said it. That's not how the scientific method works you fucking schizophrenic idiot.

LOOOOOOOOOOL.

#1 post.

Clues are clues, it's not evidence as I said 5 times already. When they add up pointing in one direction they gain much more significance. Of course, one shouldn't expect certain individuals with doubtful inteligence to understand this logically. It's the same as reading Zep's posts. There are clues he is retarded but I can't really go to court with it presenting it as evidence. Now, it might seem that not commenting on a thread that you dislike takes less than a second but when you have nothing else to do you continue for 11 pages. Right, Zep? And how dare I give information to people that might (or might not) warn them of upcoming danger. That's not what responsible individuals like Zeppy do. It's much better to spend your days trolling online, just to feel better about yourself.

On May 03 2012 15:36 D_smart_S wrote: About the card game - there was a video where Steve Jackson, the creator explained in court or some other similar setting details about the game. I know that the FBI raided him once but there isn't a whole lot of information on the subject.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steve_Ja..._Inc._v._United_States_Secret_Service

I got to tell you guys, it took me all night to google "illuminati card game", click the wikipedia link, click steve jackson and finally click the court case.

On May 04 2012 07:01 D_smart_S wrote: Clues are clues, it's not evidence as I said 5 times already. When they add up pointing in one direction they gain much more significance. Of course, one shouldn't expect certain individuals with doubtful inteligence to understand this logically. It's the same as reading Zep's posts. There are clues he is retarded but I can't really go to court with it.

On May 04 2012 07:01 D_smart_S wrote: Clues are clues, it's not evidence as I said 5 times already...

Actually you originally posted in post 199 that clues are evidence. You can read it in post 201. You changed it 30 mins after you originally wrote it to clues are not evidence, which gave post 199 an entirely different meaning. Reminds me of when palak informed you that the book 1984 was first published in 1949 and you simply changed the date- As if your argument didn't lose any credibility, even though that significantly changed the point.

I always edit my posts later because when I am high I make mistakes and I forget to edit if I am high lol. The bird-plane example I gave in that post was what I really meant with clues and evidence. Whatever. I had previously stated my stand in several posts that these are clues, some stronger than others. Is that the end of the mini "clues-evidence" discussion. I think everything has been said about that so we can move on. Agree?

+ Show Spoiler +

It should come as no surprise to anyone that D_smart_S is high, as, a, fucking, kite, when he writes all of this nonsense.

Which sort of explains it, I suppose.

On May 03 2012 04:02 D_smart_S wrote: - US Navy base in California. After many complaints they changed (or are changing right now) the shape of the bases. Of course, it was just a mistake that the architects made involuntarily. As we know architects rarely know the plan of the building and would never notice the shape of the swastika in all the monts of construction of the bases.

I know you don't believe ANYTHING the mainstream media has to say, but for the rest of us, there is at least another possibility besides the "it's Illuminati" story.
NY Times on swastika looking barracks

On May 03 2012 06:19 VanDerMeyde wrote: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/B-25_Empire_State_Building_crash Why didnt Empire State building collapse ?

But just in case.
B-25 specs: 15.55m x 4.98m w/ wingspan 20.59m, max takeoff weight 15876kg, cruise speed of 230
www.aviation-history.com/north-america/b25.html
767-200ER specs: 48.5m x 4.7m w/ wingspan 47.6m, max takeoff weight 179170kg, speed at impact 465mph (well below cruise speed)
www.boeing.com/commercial/767family/pf/pf_200prod.html and speed at impact wiki American airlines flight 11.
Impacts r not near the same.

On May 03 2012 07:00 D_smart_S wrote: Show nested quote + On May 03 2012 06:19 VanDerMeyde wrote: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/B-25_Empire_State_Building_crash Why didnt Empire State building collapse ? It's like the perfect example of what happens when a plane comes crashing into a building. There was an Amsterdam plane crash into a civil building that is much less strong than the Twin Towers and it was still standing after the crash. But let's not go to 9/11, it's been discussed as much as anything else.

Two crashes are not comparable just because a plane hit a building. By your logic I could say, my apartment survived the eastern US earthquake from last year therefore all buildings should survive all earthquakes meaning Haiti having collpased buildings in the 2010 quake is a conspiracy.

On May 03 2012 07:06 VanillaDutch wrote: i approve of this thread. ignore the trolls d_smart_s. palak, how much do you think the rothschild family networth is?

Few billion. Forbes put them at $1.5 bil in 2002 http://www.forbes.com/2002/02/28/0228dynasties_print.html
Many conspiracy theorists have a habit of claiming their networth, along with the Rockerfellas, at higher than all the money in the world combined.

On May 04 2012 03:14 D_smart_S wrote: That's how the Illuminati play their game. They love subliminals to give a fair chance to people and also to make their game more amusing. There is no evidence before a crime, just clues. Just like their card game. These clues are like puzzle pieces. Individually, they don't mean much but when put together you start seeing the bigger picture.

Please provide citations from scientific literature supporting this claim.

Also, could you pelase explain how putting these clues is conductive towards Illuminati goal?
It seems to me that leaving such clues decreases the chance of their schemes succeeding.