https://www.liquidpoker.net/


LP international Poland    Contact            Users: 452 Active, 1 Logged in - Time: 15:34

limit strategy obv

New to LiquidPoker? Register here for free!
rss
My New Game
  Floofy, Feb 16 2012

Hi guys i programmed a new game i was wondering if anyone wants to test it, or have ideas for it.

Its a game based on a classic computer science problem called knapsack problem, but i believe my version is more complex.

In this game, you first pick the number of gems that there will be for sale (i recommend 30-40), and then they are all randomly generated. All of them have a price between 10-30, a type (attack speed life) and a value (based on price, but a bit random).

You start with 100$ and can buy as many gems as you want, and all of those boost your warrior.

You can either play against a friend or against the computer by clicking a button which makes his pick all of his gems (the more gems there are, the longer his thinking time takes. Over 50 gems takes him a LONG time).

Then once both players are done picking, the battle is simulated 100 000 times (or more) and the % of the time each player won is displayed.

Note: speed determines what % of the time your character strikes. So if your speed is much higher than the ennemy, your character will play a lot more often than the ennemy.

Right now, the computer is extremely difficult to beat, i can only tie with him. The strategy is to try to pick the gems that offers the best price/value ratio, while making sure you spend all of your money, and you balance speed/attack/life properly.

The computer isn't perfect, but he plays really well.



0 votes

Comments (7)


My first "perfect" AI for a game
  Floofy, Feb 12 2012

Hey guys.

If you want this to be fast, go to TLDR.

First some news about me: still with gf, working a small job + university in computer science.

Recently i've been really interested in programming all kind of AIs (eventually my goal might be to program a poker HU limit bot that will be really tough, but thats way more complex than what i'm doing atm. A chess bot also interest me, but thats too complex for me right now).

Right now, i've programmed a bot for the following game:

There is a number (like 100), and each players does a mathematical operation on that number, one after another. The objective of the game is to be the first to make the number reach 0.

My computer is currently perfect... once he gets the "edge" he is unbeatable.

At first, the game only had 3 options: -1 -2 -3, which resulted in the game being way too simple (strategy was to keep it at a multiple of 4 at all time for the opponement).

Now, i had added -6 and /2 and /3, but i feel its still way too simple of a game (the bot only sometimes needs to use /2 or /3 at the beginning, and then never needs to use it again).

If anyone have suggestions to make it more interesting, let me know. (i can easily put any mathematic operations and the bot will automaticelly find the best solution).

I need "options" that will make the game very complex, right now the bot can just use patterns which makes the whole AI i programmed not so impressive.

TLDR:
I programmed a game where both players try to reach 0 (or less) first. at beginning its something like 500, and both players gets to pick between a series of mathematical operations one after another (-1 -2 -3 /2 /3). However, the problem is the game is way too simple and my AI can easily find the best play and it seems to be repetitive patterns. i want to the options to make the complex and interesting, any suggestions?



0 votes

Comments (18)


Sex Question
  Floofy, Nov 14 2011

nvm



0 votes

Comments (44)


GF problems
  Floofy, Oct 28 2011

Hmmm so i have some sort of GF problem and it seems like it can't hurt to post about it on LP!

here it is.

My aunt usually rents cars, and then let my dad buy them. This is good for my dad since he knows the car he buys are good (my aunt is carefull with them).

Then, my dad has always given/sold me his cars, since i know theyre good.

A few months ago, he called me and told me that, in april, hes gonna sell me his acura 2005 (worth like 6K) for 2500$ (value of my own car, which i would sell). Then my GF says she wanted to buy my car, since her own car is becomming real shit (its a 1990...).

However, my aunt decided to... change cars RIGHT NOW. This is a problem because now, my dad would have to pay for 2 cars at the same time (both his acura he would sell me, and his new car). So he is now considering selling his acura to a random to get 6000$ for it. He says that its not worth it for me to pay higher price than 2500 since the acura's value would drop way faster than my own car's value.

So 2 days ago, my GF told me to ask my dad what hes going to do, because she was going to do some fixing on her car, but if shes going to get my car at the end of the month, then she won't do it (waste of money). My dad kinda told me it was fine, and that hes going to sell me his car now. However, he didn't seem too sure about it (kinda an important decision).

Today, i talked to my dad again, and he said hes not sure at all about it anymore. He explained to me that, my car is perfectly fine for me right now, if he sells his car 6K to some random, he's going to save a lot of money, and i really don't need a luxury car that much since anyways, my own car is working just fine. However he said that if he doesn't manage to get 6K, he is going to sell it to me.

Now i call my gf, and you can imagine she was disapointed. My car is decent (2002 honda civic) and i was going to sell it to her for 2500$. So now shes either forced to deal with her crap car that can't be completly repaired, or buy a new one, which is risky. Also, she's REALLY mad that my dad changed his mind since he "said" that she would get my car for 2500$. She kinda said "hey he promised it and now he changed his mind, thats horrible". She also claims if she had never been offered my car, she would have searched for new cars and shit, and would have been in better shape.

Now she's so mad that she said she won't talk to my dad ever again. Obviously i can't imagine having a GF that won't talk to my dad ever.

I also can't get a definite answer from my dad, he really does not want to rush such a decision.

What should i do, and is my GF right to be this mad?

Also i gotta agree my dad tends to make a lot of nice plans and they sometimes don't happen, however hes also a very generous dad (i rather be promised a lot of things and have some of it happen rather than having nothing promised at all...).



0 votes

Comments (50)


Philosophical Theory
  Floofy, Oct 12 2011

I'm not exactly sure how dumb this theory is so i will avoid posting it in general.

This is strange theory i've been thinking about, so here it is.

Assuming that life, after death, is the same as not existing, can we say that dying sucks a lot?
My theory states that it cannot be "that bad".

Here's why:

Being dead, and not existing, is the same thing. Once you don't exist anymore, you are in the same situation as someone who has never existed: you both don't exist.

Now, if you think not existing (or being dead) is a terrible thing, then you should kinda feel bad for donald duck. Donald duck does not exist and will never exist/enjoy life. Why do we feel sad for people who had the chance to live, and are now dead, but not for people who NEVER had the chance to live? both of them does not exist, and one has never existed, it seems like the one who has never existed is in a worst position (or at least, in the same position).

So now lets say i feel bad for donald duck since he does not exist. Then i could basicelly feel bad for... AN INFINITY of person/things which are "dead"/does not exist.

In short, only one of the 3 following things is possible:

#1 Being dead is not that bad
#2 An infinity of persons/things are experiencing a terrible thing (not existing/being dead)
#3 Having never existed is not as bad as being dead.


In short, i think death is something you shouldn't worry about, since an INFINITY of persons are currently in the state of "Not existing". So if the result of death is not existing anymore, then you just join an INFINITY of people/things, so unless an infinity of things/people are currently in a poor state (scary to think that), dying can't be that poor of a state.

However, life is whitout a doubt better than not existing... so it seems like an infinity of person/things are currently in a state which is not as good as it could be. So should we feel sad for all of those people who does not exist anymore (dead people) AND for the infinity of fictional people who never had the chance to live?



0 votes

Comments (39)


Silver back =(
  Floofy, Oct 12 2011

Oh well new mods doesn't like me =( Reposting on blog

Would you fight, for 1 billion dollar, in an arena similar to a spartacus arena (fairly large), the following:

a very angry/dangerous/hungry 250 kg male silver back (completly enraged)


BUT

with the help of:

#1 A 6 feets Poleaxe (which is light enough so you can use it well, but still decently solid)


AND

#2 A well trained dog (one that looks like the one in the picture) that will do anything it can to save you (not some stupid dog, one that would be trained to stay with you and try to help you, he won't just run away or suicide into the gorilla).


If you win, you get a billion dollar. If you loose, well, you die.


Poll: Would you do it?
(Vote): Yes, right now!
(Vote): No, i would never do it.
(Vote): Only if i had some time to train.


Poll: For those who answer yes, would you still do it whitout the dog?
(Vote): Yes, i would still do it even whitout the help of the dog.
(Vote): No, i would not do it whitout the help of the dog.





0 votes

Comments (14)


Need Advice
  Floofy, Oct 08 2011

Sorry guys i know i have not come on here for a while now (since i don't really play poker anymore) but something just happened to me and i'm not sure who to ask advice to and you guys have generally been great advisors so here it is.

As some of you know i've been living with my GF and her brother for some time, and its going well.

However, recently (a few months ago) we decided to take a roommate because my GF isn't very rich and i'm greedy as fuck. It kinda gives her 200$ more a month.

Thing is, this roomate suffers from an anxiety disorder. It happened a few times that we got some conflicts (me and the roomate) because he can get really pissed off really fast for no reasons, but it never went too far since my GF would make sure it don't go too far.

However, right now, my GF suffers from a pneumonia (don't worry, she will be fine) and shes at the hospital. So today, for a really bullshit reason, the roomate got pissed off at me.

(in short, i came back from work, was talking to my gf on the phone, wanted to take a drink so i took one on the table, and he was like NO ITS MINE, so im like, ok fine ill go take another one, and then hes like HEY TAKE YOURS THATS ALREADY ON THE TABLEEEE but i didn't really understand what he said (i was on the phone) and went away and thats when he yelled hard to get that glass")

SO i was kinda pissed he yelled at me for no reasons and told my gf that hes fucked up. Then he became even more mad and yelled hard at me for calling him fucked up. Then i kinda got frustrated and told my gf i wanted us to kick him off the appartement since hes too fucked up.

At that point, my GF, who was tired, didn't really know to do so we just talked about other things and eventually ended the convo (even if she wanted to do something its kinda hard to do from her hospital bed...).

Then, the roomate told me to "go talk quietly about this at the table". So i was like, ok whatever sure. Then he won't let me say a word and says the story his own way. Then eventually, when i explain it my way, he gets REEALLLLLLY pissed off, yells his hardest, then and i call him fucked up again, and that when he shows his arm towards me (like if he was going to beat me up) and yells hard a bunch of things about not being fucked up.

At that point i was just thinking this guy is absolute nutso and ill just try and calm him down and call the police or something (i probably stood a chance in a fight but i really didn't want to risk it, not worth it, seemed much easier to dodge). So hes like "WILL YOU EVER CALL ME FUCKED UP AGAIN, showing his fist". then i'm like no no no.

Once he calms down, i seriously consider calling the police, but i'm not sure if its the right move and i go ask my gf's brother about it. He's just like "whatever, if you do it, make sure he doesn't find out..." (btw i'm kinda mad he didn't do a thing when this happened -_-).

I decide to do nothing for now...

Later on, he comes back to me, apologize, and almost begs me not to kick him out of the appartement.

So now, what should i do?

Of course it would suck a bit that my GF does not get the 200$ a month anymore, but after today, i'm starting to think this dude is seriously fucked up way more than i ever thought (before today i never thought he was THAT fucked up) and its probably not worth the money to keep him in there.



0 votes

Comments (43)


My game!
  Floofy, Feb 01 2010

Hi guys i programmed a game and i would like suggestion on how to make it more strategic.

this is a turn based game between white and black. white plays first, but starts with 54$ instead of black's 58$+3 (income when starting his turn).

The objective of the game is completly destroying opponement's wall.

There is 5 unit types:
#1 women (2$). This is what determines the number of people you can make each turns. The turn you make her, shes not active yet. For example if you start your turn with 4 womens, you can make 4 units.

#2 Peasant (4$). This is what determines your income. Every time you begin your turn, you get X$, which is the number of peasants you own.

#3 Wall (1$). This does not require womens to build

#4 Archer (5$). Explained below

#5 warrior (2$): These are what is used to attack. there is 2 attack options:
Fight: All your warriors will sacrifice themself against the wall. for each one of your warriors, one ennemy wall is destroyed, but you loose all of your warriors.
Hit and run: Your warriors will initially be killed by ennemy archers, but the survivors will destroy one wall each and run away. for example, if you have 10 warriors and ennemy has 3 archers, you will loose 3 warriors but you will destroy 7 of ennemy's wall.

When the game starts, everyone starts with 3 paysant, 3 women, and 10 wall.


The problem is that the game lacks strategy. its all about making sure its -EV for the ennemy to attack you by having enough wall/archer and making lots of peasants....
SO the game between good players usually last for a long time until someone clearly has way more peasants and eventually win

Note: i programmed a computer for it... it plays ok. if anyone wants to test it you can pm... however its not really that hard to beat whitout handicaps



0 votes

Comments (7)


Little game i made
  Floofy, Mar 21 2009

Hey i would like testers for a little game i programmed
im not 100% sure itll work because since i programmed it they usually tell u it could be dangerous or something

pm me if u want to test

anyways heres the game:
there are 10 levels
on each level, there is a set number of ennemies to kill, and a set "bonus money"

you have 6 choices of spending
one is income (cost 50$, but gives you 25$ in every future rounds)
one is mercenary (cost 50$ and kill 7+ups ennemies. its poor because its kinda "wasted money" since it wont help in later rounds)
one is archer (cost 25$, it kills one ennemy per round)
one is soldier (cost 50$, it kills a number of ennemy equal to the ups each rounds)
ugrading (cost 100$, 15 more each times. also makes the archer cost 1$ less)
Spell (Cost 100$+25, Kills an ammount of ennemy equal to the number of archer, and also reduce soldier cost by 5)

every levels gets harder and harder, but if you maintain a solid income, good ugrades, and make sure to reduce the cost of soldiers and archers, its beatable



0 votes

Comments (3)


BW bets offer
  Floofy, Aug 15 2008

Hi im looking to do bw bets

PM me if interested. im a weak player about D+ level. small bets like 3-10$ aprox.

heres a bet i wuld like to do

Me and a computer (both toss) against you (terran) on a very open map
i get some map revealers tho

but you start with more scvs, and i start with less probes, something like 2 probes vs 6 scvs makes sense



0 votes

Comments (12)




Previous Page   Next Page



Poker Streams

















Copyright © 2024. LiquidPoker.net All Rights Reserved
Contact Advertise Sitemap