1
 |
K40Cheddar   United States. Aug 30 2010 21:00. Posts 2202 | | | |
| |
|
|
1
 |
zulu_nation8   United States. Aug 30 2010 21:03. Posts 1929 | | |
i would fold very very fast. |
|
|
1
 |
wakamaru   United States. Aug 30 2010 21:14. Posts 236 | | |
i would fold faster than zulu. |
|
|
1
 |
vlseph   United States. Aug 30 2010 21:18. Posts 3026 | | |
i'd fold slower than both of you |
|
| The only hands a nit balances in his range are the nuts, the second nuts, and the third nuts. | |
|
|
1
 |
Venrae   United States. Aug 30 2010 23:01. Posts 1545 | | |
I'd timebank fold because fuck him. |
|
| Learn to appreciate the value of the dollar. The rest is easy. (Hurricane @ TL) | |
|
|
1
 |
SugoGosu   Korea (South). Aug 31 2010 00:53. Posts 1793 | | |
i'd timebank shove because fuck money. |
|
| Say this outloud! Why was six afraid of seven?......Because Seven Eight Nine | Last edit: 31/08/2010 00:53 |
|
|
1
 |
SpasticInk   Sweden. Aug 31 2010 01:41. Posts 6298 | | |
I would take my time and then probably fold.
Why are you making quick decisions. Think and react. |
|
|
1
 |
Gim   . Aug 31 2010 14:58. Posts 41 | | |
Just to help a beginner out, can someone explain their thought process for this hand? Are we assuming that most 11/7 nits will 3bet overpairs, or would not raise the turn bet in position?
Which hands are valuebetting here, given a 11 VPIP. Are 89 and 67 possible, or are we just worried about sets? |
|
|
1
 |
SpasticInk   Sweden. Aug 31 2010 15:21. Posts 6298 | | |
I think the basic assumption is that a tight player would almost always call with a hand like a flushdraw/9x and never turn these hands into semi-bluffs.
On the other hand he will shove almost every hand that beats us (like 88, 89, 67 etc.)
|
|
|
1
 |
Venrae   United States. Aug 31 2010 15:25. Posts 1545 | | |
| | On August 31 2010 13:58 Gim wrote:
Just to help a beginner out, can someone explain their thought process for this hand? Are we assuming that most 11/7 nits will 3bet overpairs, or would not raise the turn bet in position?
Which hands are valuebetting here, given a 11 VPIP. Are 89 and 67 possible, or are we just worried about sets? |
pretty much what spasticink said. nits aren't taking a whole lot of hands to the turn and the hands we beat are 1pair type hands that he isn't going to be raising with. |
|
| Learn to appreciate the value of the dollar. The rest is easy. (Hurricane @ TL) | |
|
|
1
 |
LemOn[5thF]   Czech Republic. Aug 31 2010 15:28. Posts 15163 | | |
| | On August 31 2010 13:58 Gim wrote:
Just to help a beginner out, can someone explain their thought process for this hand? Are we assuming that most 11/7 nits will 3bet overpairs, or would not raise the turn bet in position?
Which hands are valuebetting here, given a 11 VPIP. Are 89 and 67 possible, or are we just worried about sets? |
Sets only, never 89/67. |
| |
|
|
1
 |
Zalfor   United States. Aug 31 2010 15:34. Posts 2236 | | |
realize that he has you beat here 100% of the time.
ur equity in this hand is probably somewhere between 0% and 5%
doesn't look like the odds are in your favor. Unless you're corellian. |
|
|
1
 |
traxamillion   United States. Aug 31 2010 18:58. Posts 10468 | | |
| | On August 31 2010 14:34 Zalfor wrote:
realize that he has you beat here 100% of the time.
ur equity in this hand is probably somewhere between 0% and 5%
doesn't look like the odds are in your favor. Unless you're corellian. |
nice reference
this kid has a set just fold |
|
|
1
 |
zulu_nation8   United States. Aug 31 2010 19:03. Posts 1929 | | |
he might have 89s/67s in his range if he's a good nit. Also 11/8 over 150 hands can become much looser over a larger sample, but yea if he can bluff/semi-bluff here he would be a pretty sick nit. |
|
|
1
 |
sTrAtO   Mexico. Aug 31 2010 19:39. Posts 5882 | | | |
|
| -Karla:Mira, tu película! -Yo: cuál? -Karla: Big Fish! jaja | |
|
|
1
 |
joLin   United States. Aug 31 2010 19:52. Posts 3818 | | |
| | On August 31 2010 18:39 sTrAtO wrote:
u guys srs? I suck |
are you considering calling? bcuz i sort of am. might be bad though i dunno. |
|
| YoUr_KiLLeR @ TL | Last edit: 31/08/2010 19:52 |
|
|
1
 |
MeaL   United States. Aug 31 2010 20:41. Posts 3079 | | |
i would shove cacth and A on the river like barry greenstein |
|
|
1
 |
edzwoo   United States. Aug 31 2010 22:08. Posts 5911 | | |
Not a fan of snap folding in these positions. More of a fan of tank folding with no other info. |
|
|
1
 |
qwerty67890   New Zealand. Aug 31 2010 22:38. Posts 14026 | | |
fold pf, just to be on the safe side |
|
|
1
 |
JSquids   United States. Aug 31 2010 22:42. Posts 1142 | | |
dont listen to any of these assholes here. reraise. |
|
| AKA StarsNStripes@azeroth | |
|
|
|