1
 |
zulu_nation8   United States. Aug 20 2010 01:53. Posts 1929 | | | |
|
| | Last edit: 20/08/2010 01:54 |
|
|
1
 |
Spicy   United States. Aug 20 2010 02:12. Posts 1027 | | |
You could probably get called by a 9 or a T that had diamonds. But yeah it might be a little thin here as he probably has too many medium connectors in his range that include a 7 or have 2 pair that he's never folding.
edit: lol oops I thought you were OOP, IP this is still a check behind |
|
| | Last edit: 20/08/2010 02:50 |
|
|
1
 |
bigredhoss   Cook Islands. Aug 20 2010 02:13. Posts 8649 | | |
yeah i think it's a little too light, it might be close since he's a station but it's so easy for him to have made 2p at some point along the way or have a 7 (either one of which he could probably be checking with the way you described your image + he's a fish). getting to see what he called flop and turn with isn't so bad either. |
| |
|
|
1
 |
AznFisherman   United States. Aug 20 2010 02:46. Posts 956 | | |
too wet of a board to be doing something like this, check it back on the river :/ |
|
|
1
 |
SpasticInk   Sweden. Aug 20 2010 09:43. Posts 6298 | | |
ten is a really bad card since he probably calls flop/turn w/ any one-pair combo hand like 97/67/87, hell he could even have 8T/9T if he is really fishy.
probably check and expect him NOT to bluff you off a higher pair, and when he bet you can safely assume you are beat.
|
|
|
1
 |
bigredhoss   Cook Islands. Aug 20 2010 12:07. Posts 8649 | | |
| | On August 20 2010 08:43 SpasticInk wrote:
probably check and expect him NOT to bluff you off a higher pair, and when he bet you can safely assume you are beat.
|
villain can't bet after we check behind river yo |
| |
|
|
1
 |
SpasticInk   Sweden. Aug 20 2010 14:56. Posts 6298 | | |
oh lol...
then I would say this is really thin, unless you did this as a bluff? |
|
|
1
 |
soberstone   United States. Aug 20 2010 16:34. Posts 2662 | | |
| | On August 20 2010 13:56 SpasticInk wrote:
oh lol...
then I would say this is really thin, unless you did this as a bluff? |
Bluffing what exactly? |
|
|
1
 |
boreHM   Netherlands. Aug 20 2010 17:02. Posts 1595 | | |
okay maybe we assume that he never checks a straight to us on river and never fails to crai sets or two pairs on the turn? |
|
|
1
 |
JSquids   United States. Aug 20 2010 18:52. Posts 1142 | | |
lol. ez check back.... pretty funny comments guys keep the lulz coming |
|
| AKA StarsNStripes@azeroth | |
|
|
1
 |
bigredhoss   Cook Islands. Aug 20 2010 20:58. Posts 8649 | | |
| | On August 20 2010 17:52 JSquids wrote:
lol. ez check back.... pretty funny comments guys keep the lulz coming |
maybe you should elaborate on which comments you think are funny, considering everyone else has said the same thing (that it's a check back) |
|
| Truck-Crash Life | Last edit: 20/08/2010 20:59 |
|
|
1
 |
JSquids   United States. Aug 20 2010 21:16. Posts 1142 | | |
| | On August 20 2010 19:58 bigredhoss wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 20 2010 17:52 JSquids wrote:
lol. ez check back.... pretty funny comments guys keep the lulz coming |
maybe you should elaborate on which comments you think are funny, considering everyone else has said the same thing (that it's a check back)
|
lol |
|
| AKA StarsNStripes@azeroth | |
|
|
1
| |
i like the bet on the river.
even if this bet in itself isn't making you money directly.
there are still a large % of cases where he will fold instead of showdown and this will make less thin valuebets in the future more profitable
the % of times he calls and you either win or are beat, this will make your future bluffs more profitable.
if he calls you are mostly beat but there will be quite some instances where he folds on this river. |
|
|
1
 |
bigredhoss   Cook Islands. Aug 20 2010 21:34. Posts 8649 | | | |
| |
|
|
1
 |
zulu_nation8   United States. Aug 20 2010 21:35. Posts 1929 | | |
Well it would have to be the near future since he's not a reg. The regs at the table probably don't care anyway. |
|
|
|