NL100 200bb+ 3bet pot

Guy is 59/18 over 78 hands, doesn't fold to 3bets, doesn't fold flops or turns or rivers (1x). Has 3bet a few times. UTG is opening 32% of hands over a decent sample and folds to 3bets about half the time from all positions.

What should the squeeze sizing be (clearly I'm awful and butchered it) or should we even squeeze given everyone is a cally faggot? Is the river a shove? I have absolutely no idea how some random fish perceives this spot given action and deepness or if he even realizes anything... Meh I'm getting worse the more I play fml.

thx guys

Submitted by : Skew

PokerStars Game #48377821176: Holdem No Limit ($0.50/$1.00 USD) - 2010/08/19 10:10:43 PT [2010/08/19 13:10:43 ET]
Table Orsilocus II 6-max Seat #1 is the button
Seat 1: cap. marb ($113.30 in chips)
Seat 2: minoppss ($324.45 in chips)
Seat 3: Hero ($302 in chips)
Seat 4: Prospero ($233.35 in chips)
Seat 5: gbandman21 ($250 in chips)
Seat 6: realraw72 ($223.30 in chips)
minoppss: posts small blind $0.50
Hero: posts big blind $1
cap. marb: posts the ante $0.20
minoppss: posts the ante $0.20
Hero: posts the ante $0.20
Prospero: posts the ante $0.20
gbandman21: posts the ante $0.20
realraw72: posts the ante $0.20

Holecards
Dealt to Hero
Prospero: raises $2 to $3
gbandman21: folds
realraw72: calls $3
cap. marb: folds
minoppss: calls $2.50
Hero: raises $13 to $16
Prospero: calls $13
realraw72: calls $13
minoppss: calls $13

Flop (Pot : $64.00)

   
minoppss: checks
Hero: bets $22
Prospero: folds
realraw72: calls $22
minoppss: folds

Turn (Pot : $108.00)

   
Hero: bets $46
realraw72: calls $46

River (Pot : $200.00)

   
Hero: checks
realraw72: bets $139.10 and is all-in
Hero: folds

well if he really never folds to 3bets then you can just make it a bit bigger pre why not? this will get you less action from regs and the same amount of action from him

if he still has some kind of 59% range on the river then you obviously have that crushed, but does he bluff his entire range? does he ever bluff?

well i dunt ever think he has JJ+ here since he flatted a raise pre as well as he didnt 4bet. regarding the preflop sizing i think 18 would be better since the opponents seem to be a bit stationy. on the river vs realdraw, it's a matter of whether u think he's more likely to spazz bluff more or call off more. if he has a 4x or 9x i'd just chalk it up as cooler vs fish. i think check calling is better because he's very liable to fold 88 below and he could have a bunch of Ax or something in his range or total air that's gonna spazz shove that river =T

On August 20 2010 17:54 wakamaru wrote: well i dunt ever think he has JJ+ here since he flatted a raise pre as well as he didnt 4bet. regarding the preflop sizing i think 18 would be better since the opponents seem to be a bit stationy. on the river vs realdraw, it's a matter of whether u think he's more likely to spazz bluff more or call off more. if he has a 4x or 9x i'd just chalk it up as cooler vs fish. i think check calling is better because he's very liable to fold 88 below and he could have a bunch of Ax or something in his range or total air that's gonna spazz shove that river =T

i hate the first sentance. he can easily have JJ+ do u really think this guy HAS a 4 bet range???? lol???

I call and hate life given how the board ran out.

i don't see the point of betting turn if you're going to c-f river. if you're trying to get thin value from 55-88 or ace high you can accomplish the same thing on river if turn goes check-check, board is about as non-drawy as you can get. but as played yeah agree with dusty i just click call and feel meh about it.

i would either bet turn and shove river myself, or i would check turn and evaluate (and also check river if he checks back turn). in general the turn is a spot where a lot of fish love to check back 9x or 4x so if he has one of those i would expect him to check back turn pretty often and bet either a retardedly big or retardedly small amount on the river and make my decision relatively easier either way.

given that it's 4-way makes me lean towards checking the turn and evaluating over barreling for value. but yeah after 78 hands with a 59/18 i would expect to have enough reads on his postflop play to make this a straightforward decision most of the time. i mean does he bluff or not? lol

On August 20 2010 18:23 JSquids wrote: Show nested quote + On August 20 2010 17:54 wakamaru wrote: well i dunt ever think he has JJ+ here since he flatted a raise pre as well as he didnt 4bet. regarding the preflop sizing i think 18 would be better since the opponents seem to be a bit stationy. on the river vs realdraw, it's a matter of whether u think he's more likely to spazz bluff more or call off more. if he has a 4x or 9x i'd just chalk it up as cooler vs fish. i think check calling is better because he's very liable to fold 88 below and he could have a bunch of Ax or something in his range or total air that's gonna spazz shove that river =T i hate the first sentance. he can easily have JJ+ do u really think this guy HAS a 4 bet range???? lol???

+1 to he can have JJ-QQ but -10 cause he's not shoving river for thin value

considering his range JJ+ is certainly in it; but from him I would be more worried he has a 4 or 9. He seems a calling station, so I would fold here and take him down on another hand.

I call here prolly and get pissed at 97o or fist pump against A high. It really depends on whether you've seen him bluff or not.

Dbl

You guys are some real optimistic mother fuckers thinkin a dude is gonna call a 3b then float flop and turn with air then shove it on the river.

he probably has 89o