Heads up PLO rake, WTF?

Hi, I play on the entraction network low stakes heads up PLO end I'm paying 15BB/100 in rake! Thats 3 buyins every 1000 hands. WTF?
Do any of You guys who play on other sites pay that much in rake?

what?

in general: low stakes + heads up + plo = gl beating the rake

Dunno about the Euro networks, but I have no idea why people think HU rake is brutal. On the big sites it's capped at 50c, so it's actually really little.

But yeah 15BB/100 sounds absolutely ridiculous. If you went allin every single hand on Stars or FTP, you would be raked at $50/100 hands, or 5BB/100 at NL50.

Your math skills suprise me

On August 18 2010 10:10 edzwoo wrote: Dunno about the Euro networks, but I have no idea why people think HU rake is brutal. On the big sites it's capped at 50c, so it's actually really little. But yeah 15BB/100 sounds absolutely ridiculous. If you went allin every single hand on Stars or FTP, you would be raked at $50/100 hands, or 5BB/100 at NL50.

it's capped at 1$ on euro sites so if you're playing nl100 or lower the rake is really high.

games are fairly easier but its just impossible to get a good winrate without running like absolute god. ive seen good players do very well then mindfuck themselves when they start playing an extremely huge sample. either by moving up and hitting the doomswitch or just by running like absolute horseshit. imo that game cant be beat for a really large sample simply because of the rake
i dunno but id stick with holdem if u put in a lot of volume

On August 18 2010 10:10 edzwoo wrote: Dunno about the Euro networks, but I have no idea why people think HU rake is brutal. On the big sites it's capped at 50c, so it's actually really little. But yeah 15BB/100 sounds absolutely ridiculous. If you went allin every single hand on Stars or FTP, you would be raked at $50/100 hands, or 5BB/100 at NL50.

how do you get 50 dollars per 100 hands to become 5BB/100???

anyway, I played some NL50 HU at FTP (who capped at 0.5) and If I remember correct I had like 10BB/100 in rake. Because people at that level call every fucking hand.

[  ] There is math itt

double post

On August 18 2010 21:29 SpasticInk wrote: Show nested quote + On August 18 2010 10:10 edzwoo wrote: Dunno about the Euro networks, but I have no idea why people think HU rake is brutal. On the big sites it's capped at 50c, so it's actually really little. But yeah 15BB/100 sounds absolutely ridiculous. If you went allin every single hand on Stars or FTP, you would be raked at $50/100 hands, or 5BB/100 at NL50. how do you get 50 dollars per 100 hands to become 5BB/100??? anyway, I played some NL50 HU at FTP (who capped at 0.5) and If I remember correct I had like 10BB/100 in rake. Because people at that level call every fucking hand.

OOPS LOL NVM IT'S 50BB/100

I made the assumption that 15BB/100 was ridiculous because I thought it was 5BB/100. I guess that makes more sense now, just ignore my post

layoff the drugs edzwoo, $50 every 100 hands at 50nl is 100bb/100

He maybe talks about ptbb, or more specifically, big bets

Does 6 max PLO games also have such high rake?

i would kill myself if i paid 50ptbb/100 in rake ;(

On August 30 2010 04:58 YoMeR wrote: i would kill myself if i paid 50ptbb/100 in rake ;(

Not me man, I'd just grind @ McDonalds