playing on ft of 180 max

Its pretty hard to call someone a lucksac when they are winning over a decent sample. From the 2 hands I actually could see up there. the JQ one wasn't even bad considering that ThoNapalm is shoving ATC there. The JTo on the other hand I dunno why he would limp it there. Either way though hes no donk.

i know that some of these shows arent retarded but a lot of his moves which i didnt post here are retarded as iso shove with t9s...and i see it every day while playing with him 180max games. i think u agree that that move is retarded

or is it the taboo?

On May 22 2010 14:08 Zep wrote: Show nested quote + On May 20 2010 02:51 Mierzwix wrote: when it comes to mi turtle i m convinced that he is retarded lucky donkey who has no idea what he is doing...just Wow so you name half a dozen spots and you call him a luck sac? im pretty sure we can rule out he is just a luck sac considering he has 17500 games under his name and is raping every stake he plays.

does this guy teach people for SNG? :O

or are you just terrible?

On May 22 2010 20:31 Zep wrote: or are you just terrible?

yes i am and u r great because u think that turtle is the greatest just because u r result oreinted donk who thinks that 17.5k sngos mean everything for a long run sit n go grinder

u can be a winning players in 180 max games and loose a lot of money in 10-15k tournaments- it is variance, just look at the boku's 180 max graph. u need to realize it takes a huge sample to tell if one is a good sng player, there is too many out there who think they are the best after a ridiculous number of games played and that is pretty sad. and zep if u dont understand it u r a retard lol

On May 22 2010 20:31 YunhOLee wrote: Show nested quote + On May 22 2010 14:08 Zep wrote:   On May 20 2010 02:51 Mierzwix wrote: when it comes to mi turtle i m convinced that he is retarded lucky donkey who has no idea what he is doing...just Wow so you name half a dozen spots and you call him a luck sac? im pretty sure we can rule out he is just a luck sac considering he has 17500 games under his name and is raping every stake he plays. does this guy teach people for SNG? :O

yes he is lol. i think he advises his students repushes with T9s because of a tremendous "suckout value". flushes on his boards hit all the time, so whats the difference, u know

On May 22 2010 23:43 Mierzwix wrote: Show nested quote + On May 22 2010 20:31 YunhOLee wrote:   On May 22 2010 14:08 Zep wrote:   On May 20 2010 02:51 Mierzwix wrote: when it comes to mi turtle i m convinced that he is retarded lucky donkey who has no idea what he is doing...just Wow so you name half a dozen spots and you call him a luck sac? im pretty sure we can rule out he is just a luck sac considering he has 17500 games under his name and is raping every stake he plays. does this guy teach people for SNG? :O yes he is lol. i think he advises his students repushes with T9s because of a tremendous "suckout value". flushes on his boards hit all the time, so whats the difference, u know

HU4ROLLZ ANYTIME

I don't get it. I don't even know whats going on anymore. you said he was a luckbox we said he wasnt hes winning over a pretty decent sample size. now your saying 17.5k isnt enough? And no I don't think you can find any good sng player who is losing money over 17k sngs.

why dont u just comment on his plays? are these moves good in your opinions? LOL tell me sth good about it plz

Last 2 hands

His M is like 2.2-2.3 there. The JT call is because the other guy also has M < 3 so pushes wide range and calling there with JTo cannot be very bad. It may be slightly -$ ev but only slightly, but calling and doubling up gives him some chips which is what really matters I guess.
Playing ev-optimal poker on penny scale with stack of M=2 is not what these guys have in mind.

The last hand: he has M=2.2 or so, smallest stack on the table and picks up JQo. WTF is your problem with that call?

On May 23 2010 07:12 Mierzwix wrote: why dont u just comment on his plays? are these moves good in your opinions? LOL tell me sth good about it plz

I already did comment on the 2 hands that actually worked for me

On May 23 2010 07:12 Mierzwix wrote: why dont u just comment on his plays? are these moves good in your opinions? LOL tell me sth good about it plz

HU4ROLLZ NIGGA

On May 23 2010 14:28 Zep wrote: Show nested quote + On May 23 2010 07:12 Mierzwix wrote: why dont u just comment on his plays? are these moves good in your opinions? LOL tell me sth good about it plz HU4ROLLZ NIGGA

LOL RETARD

On May 23 2010 14:28 Zep wrote: Show nested quote + On May 23 2010 07:12 Mierzwix wrote: why dont u just comment on his plays? are these moves good in your opinions? LOL tell me sth good about it plz HU4ROLLZ NIGGA

wtf

On May 22 2010 22:13 Mierzwix wrote: Show nested quote + On May 22 2010 20:31 Zep wrote: or are you just terrible? yes i am and u r great because u think that turtle is the greatest just because u r result oreinted donk who thinks that 17.5k sngos mean everything for a long run sit n go grinder

is this a level?

all hands by turtle posted here seems to me pretty std, don't know wthat is the OP problem..

MI_turtle 28,257 $3 $28 36% $93,091 Tilt 86 PokerStars

TURTLE NINJA ahahaha

agreed, all standard.

And his saying MI_Turtle aka Nick Rainey, who has been pretty much #1 tournament player on PokerStars in TLB for 2 years or more, is a luckbox, is pretty hilarious.

Can a mod please get in here and ban all the guys with literally zero posts and are spamming?