4
 |
JonnyCosMo   United States. May 18 2010 16:29. Posts 7292 | | | |
|
| Everyone needs to see that you are king of the castle - PoorUser | Last edit: 18/05/2010 16:30 |
|
|
1
 |
acdawg712   United States. May 18 2010 17:42. Posts 2639 | | |
My opinion is not very good, since I mainly play 6 max plo and 1/2 plo live. When I win at 1/2, it's based on the fundamental mistakes of the bad players. When good players fill the table, it is much harder for me to adjust. I would figure on this board that we could bet non nut flushes since calling down medium or low flushes is a terrible idea. We could also bet air(if we have A spade we should probably bet) and maybe sets for deception value. I hope I am not too far off and look forward to more advice. |
|
| phil hellmuth is genuinely a stupid person and he does not understand poker very well at all - [vital]myth | |
|
|
1
| |
I'd bet a couple of streets to get money of the fish. If I understand the blind structure you guys are sitting fairly shallow and considering how the fish is after eddieguy he can't really bluff with impunity either. Unless the fish can fold. |
|
|
1
 |
EvilSky   Czech Republic. May 19 2010 08:23. Posts 8918 | | |
I think with the fish in the hand you have to bet here for value, protection, defining your hand and bla bla bla. If you decide to check call/call seems standard but again I dont think you are deep enough or vs a tough enough player/s to not bet here. |
|
|
1
 |
n0rthf4ce   United States. May 19 2010 10:15. Posts 8119 | | |
i bet the flop and go from there |
| |
|
|
1
 |
nolan   Ireland. May 19 2010 23:04. Posts 6205 | | |
yeah im betting every street basically |
|
| On September 08 2008 10:07 Baal wrote: my head is a gyroscope, your argument is invalid | |
|
|
4
 |
JonnyCosMo   United States. May 20 2010 23:19. Posts 7292 | | |
I've been told by good PLO players that checking the flop is standard o.o thoughts? |
|
| Everyone needs to see that you are king of the castle - PoorUser | |
|
|
1
 |
MiPwnYa   Brasil. May 20 2010 23:29. Posts 5230 | | |
id really like to know what reasons would make checking flop a standard, especially with a fish in the hand |
|
|
1
 |
MiPwnYa   Brasil. May 20 2010 23:30. Posts 5230 | | |
just cause eddie can blufff us off the best hand with the bare As? |
|
|
1
| |
Checking flop seems really bad to me but what do I know. |
|
|
1
 |
Rienzilla   Netherlands. May 21 2010 09:13. Posts 7 | | |
well, obvious upside to checking the flop is that we cannot be bluffed off the best hand here. If we bet here and eddie repots, we're in big trouble and will probably have to fold, as check/calling from there will result in us being all-in on the river without the nuts 
Otoh, eddie needs balls of steel to make some bluff with the As here, as our fish is also in the hand. I'd be inclined to bet here to get money from the fish, and probably fold if eddie repots our bet.
|
|
| | Last edit: 21/05/2010 09:17 |
|
|
1
| |
Also if the turn isn't some scary card you're more likely to get 2 streets of value from your K-high flush because opponents will think you'd have bet the flop with it. |
|
|
|