question for 400nl+ regs

if you were to quantify the difference between, say, a 100nl reg and a 400/600nl reg, how would you break it down in terms of:

1. better fundamental understanding of the game
2. ability to make better reads
3. self-control/discipline

%-wise, i.e. 1. 20% 2. 50% 3. 30% (or whatever)

400nl reg will be 4x better than a 100nl reg
600nl reg will be 6x better than a 100nl reg

might want to read my post byrnesam

might want to read byrnesam's post history

On March 06 2010 11:09 animaniacs wrote: might want to read my post byrnesam

my mistake

400nl reg will be 400% better than a 100nl reg
600nl reg will be 600% better than a 100nl reg

On March 06 2010 11:10 Stygg wrote: might want to read byrnesam's post history

ok point taken. stick to photoshops pls byrnesam.

the real answer is you will never be able to quantify this type of thing.

It would be nearly impossible to compare 2 specific players, let alone an entire player-pool of different stakes.

it is possible to generalize

On March 06 2010 11:20 anon wrote: it is possible to generalize

i suddenly remember why i hated the animaniacs

On March 06 2010 11:04 byrnesam wrote: 400nl reg will be 4x better than a 100nl reg 600nl reg will be 6x better than a 100nl reg

i thought it was:
400nl reg will run 4x better than a 100nl reg
600nl reg will run 6x better than a 100nl reg

they have a bigger bankroll !

100NL regs suck

400NL/600NL regs suck less

i dunno, but phil galfond stated a difference between many 25/50 regs and a 2/4 reg is knowing when to value bet.

On March 06 2010 12:05 Twisted wrote: 100NL regs suck 400NL/600NL regs suck less

ok but im not asking how much better/worse they are, im asking what the difference is comprised of

How would you even come about quantifying something like that. Plus some 100NL regs might be ridiculously good at not tilting while understanding very little fundamentals of the game and cannot hand read even if one card is face up while a 600NL reg can soulread you while having absolutely zero self control/discipline

These threads while seemingly good at the time you posted it, is just ridiculous.

On March 06 2010 12:07 Stroggos wrote: i dunno, but phil galfond stated a difference between many 25/50 regs and a 2/4 reg is knowing when to value bet.

Yeah this is a pretty big factor . Many midstakes players don't know how to valuebet at all.

On March 06 2010 13:05 gawdawaful wrote: How would you even come about quantifying something like that.

using the criteria in my original post? ffs

Plus some 100NL regs might be ridiculously good at not tilting while understanding very little fundamentals of the game and cannot hand read even if one card is face up while a 600NL reg can soulread you while having absolutely zero self control/discipline

yes i get it different people have different strengths and weaknesses.

what if there's a 400nl reg who value bets super good but tilts a lot, does that mean phil galfond's (and twisted's) generalization about 400nl players not value-betting as well as 5knl players is irrelavent?

3 is biggest by far

On March 06 2010 11:11 byrnesam wrote: Show nested quote + On March 06 2010 11:09 animaniacs wrote: might want to read my post byrnesam my mistake 400nl reg will be 400% better than a 100nl reg 600nl reg will be 600% better than a 100nl reg

hahahah awesome