stars FPP points Vs rakeback

I'm about to clear my inital bonus at stars and dont mind playing there but am considering going to Full Tilt for the rakeback.

I read somewhere that the FPP program is no good unless you can hit Supernova level.

Anyone here have any thoughts?

i think its better now with the stellar rewards and stuff.

http://www.fpppro.com/pokerstars-rakeback.php

Cheers for the link man. I'll need to check how many VPPs I'm earning to see if its worth my while.

i hate ftp, go for a better deal... look for a 50% rb o so, being in stars as a micro player is just plain stupid... obv depends what stakes u play?

If you are Supernova and spend your points on concierge, the RB % is 31% of MGR (compared to FTP 27%). Once you add in Stellar Rewards, Milestone bonuses, and other random bonuses that PS does, I think RB there has got to be at least 40%.

EDIT: Obviously, if you are playing micros and are not SN, the deal is much worse than sites that offer full rakeback right off the bat.

Dude you're from the UK. Just take some ipoker skin or any other network where you can get 55% rakeback or whatever. I'm assuming you play micro/low limits? Most amount of rakeback is gonna >>>>> any kind of VIP system.

+ fullrigged likes to rake 10000% of every pot at 5 cent increments or woteva

Straight rakeback > vpps. VPPs are like crack.

if u like meth then go for vpps

mmmmmmmm vpps must get some

FTP does rake more at micro up to NL25 I believe, around 6.67% per pot. Take that into consideration, I THINK Stars is better for micro stakes if only slightly.

play on a euro site

can someone please tell me how hard is it to get supernova, lets assume you play sh nl200, like how many hands?

On February 07 2010 14:56 dnagardi wrote: can someone please tell me how hard is it to get supernova, lets assume you play sh nl200, like how many hands?

fpppro.com

thx