1
 |
SpasticInk   Sweden. Feb 02 2010 11:14. Posts 6298 | | |
but you played it fine, dont worry |
|
|
1
| |
i think u played it fine. Sure u coulda bet a bit more on the flop / turn. Anyways...I would throw something at the screen, and fold. |
|
| You see...whenever I start feeling sick...I just stop being sick...and be awesome instead...true story... | |
|
|
1
 |
Critterer   United Kingdom. Feb 02 2010 13:31. Posts 5337 | | |
| | On February 02 2010 04:05 joLin wrote:
if you think his bet sizing is fine you need to reevaluate the way you value bet these 60/10 fish. youre losing a ton of value in this spot. |
|
|
| LudaHid: dam.ned dam.ned dam.ned. LudaHid: dam.ned northwooden as..hole | |
|
|
1
 |
Critterer   United Kingdom. Feb 02 2010 13:34. Posts 5337 | | |
u think he calls $1 on flop but folds for $1.50? $2? $2.50 even?
ur giving urself way too much fold equity if u think this is good. u wanna be able to 3barrel AI vs passive fish, they are not often going to raise you instead just call call call, and if ur only putting in 40-50bb instead of 100 then ur losing out on 50-60bb...
these are the spots that are costing you the most money, bet sizing wrongly, standard stuff that you dont notice because hey u won half a buyin pretty goood.
as for the hand itself meh fold |
|
| LudaHid: dam.ned dam.ned dam.ned. LudaHid: dam.ned northwooden as..hole | |
|
|
1
 |
waga   United Kingdom. Feb 02 2010 13:49. Posts 2375 | | |
I've played this kind of fish yesterday , nl 200 €
very loose pre , passive postflop.
I've won a lot of money with my cbet and multibarrel 66% pot because he was really tight postflop.
It would be stupid to bet more.
60/10 =! station ... |
|
|
1
 |
joLin   United States. Feb 02 2010 13:54. Posts 3818 | | |
| | On February 02 2010 12:49 waga wrote:
I've played this kind of fish yesterday , nl 200 €
very loose pre , passive postflop.
I've won a lot of money with my cbet and multibarrel 66% pot because he was really tight postflop.
It would be stupid to bet more.
60/10 =! station ... |
one example doesnt disprove the generalization. if you had no read on a 60/10 player's postflop play, what is your default assumption? |
| |
|
|
1
 |
waga   United Kingdom. Feb 02 2010 14:06. Posts 2375 | | |
without read postflop I assume he will fold a lot.
So I don't want him to fold when I have semi nuts ...
He plays a lot of hands => he doesn't hit often => he fold a lot.
Again , fish =! station
|
|
|
1
 |
Critterer   United Kingdom. Feb 02 2010 14:31. Posts 5337 | | |
i think its a horrible assumption to think a 60/10 is likely to fold a lot postflop.
seriously seriously so horrible... |
|
| LudaHid: dam.ned dam.ned dam.ned. LudaHid: dam.ned northwooden as..hole | |
|
|
1
 |
waga   United Kingdom. Feb 02 2010 14:42. Posts 2375 | | |
Well I've asked to a high stake player , for him sizing is good.
I guess it's not that horrible ...  |
|
|
1
 |
rozyboy   Israel. Feb 02 2010 17:03. Posts 298 | | | |
|
| recently switched from weak tight to weak agressive. | |
|
|
1
 |
NewbSaibot   United States. Feb 02 2010 18:45. Posts 4952 | | |
I think he has an ace high flush! |
|
| bye now | Last edit: 02/02/2010 18:46 |
|
|
|