1
 |
phexac United States. Jul 03 2009 06:01. Posts 2563 | | |
So I have played a few sessions since the new 5xFPP system took effect on 6-max tables. Over about 4k hands (typically a sufficient sample to judge this sort of thing), my VPP/hand was ~0.586. This number is significantly higher than the typical 0.48-0.5 range under the old system. It represents a roughly 17% increase, which is pretty huge. I would expect NL400 and NL600 to see huge gains as well since before NL400 and NL200 yielded pretty much equivalent VPPs, with NL400 slightly ahead.
Hopefully my results are not a statistical fluke. I'd be interested in seeing other people's numbers. |
| |
|
|
1
 |
Shabbzoy United Kingdom. Jul 03 2009 06:22. Posts 841 | | |
seems higher at nl50 6max also, assuming that HM "stars vpps" is using the old formula |
|
|
1
|
phexac United States. Jul 03 2009 06:26. Posts 2563 | | |
I actually just kept track of VPPs I gained and divided that by the number of hands played  |
| |
|
|
1
|
Shabbzoy United Kingdom. Jul 03 2009 06:30. Posts 841 | | |
edit: actually those numbers are meaningless, sample too small
i had a 0.26/hand where it stabilises at more like 0.2 over last month |
|
| | Last edit: 03/07/2009 06:32 |
|
|
1
 |
latigra . Jul 03 2009 10:02. Posts 257 | | |
Ive had my head under a rock, what new FPP system? :o |
|
|
1
 |
Critterer United Kingdom. Jul 03 2009 10:07. Posts 5337 | | | |
|
| LudaHid: dam.ned dam.ned dam.ned. LudaHid: dam.ned northwooden as..hole | |
|
|
1
| |
I saw a slight increase at 50nl as well, although my sample size is far to small to be certain. |
|
|
1
 |
CCMoz United Kingdom. Jul 03 2009 17:51. Posts 925 | | |
any change for vpps for mtt / stt / sngs? |
| |
|
|
1
 |
Ket  United Kingdom. Jul 03 2009 18:33. Posts 8665 | | |
no it only applies to cashgames and the whole point is it more closely resembles the tournament system (5 vpps per dollar raked) |
|
|
1
|
Fujikura United States. Jul 03 2009 20:00. Posts 1795 | | |
nice :O Hope your results are accurate ^^ |
|
| aka SouL)Z(Isadie and SouL)P(Fujikura | |
|
|
1
| | |
|
| Our deepest fear is not that we are inadequate. Our deepest fear is that we are powerful beyond measure. It is our light not our darkness that most frightens us and as we let our own lights shine we unconsciously give other people permision to do the same | |
|
|
1
| |
so what's deal with this new system? no hud suxed at start but im getting used to it more now and i can see benefits.
i don't quite get the deal, we get more rb if we do not use a hud? |
|
| | Last edit: 04/07/2009 18:38 |
|
|
1
|
thewh00sel United States. Jul 04 2009 19:07. Posts 2735 | | |
| | On July 04 2009 17:37 gororokgororok wrote:
so what's deal with this new system? no hud suxed at start but im getting used to it more now and i can see benefits.
i don't quite get the deal, we get more rb if we do not use a hud? |
lol wat? has nothing to do with a HUD |
|
| A government is the most dangerous threat to man’s rights: it holds a legal monopoly on the use of physical force against legally disarmed victims. - Ayn Rand | |
|
|
1
| |
so why doesnt it work, or is this some kind of bug. |
|
|
1
 |
LemOn[5thF] Czech Republic. Jul 04 2009 19:16. Posts 15163 | | |
| | On July 04 2009 18:10 gororokgororok wrote:
so why doesnt it work, or is this some kind of bug. |
The new tables use different layout/programming, HEM and PT3 just weren't synchronized with it.
I love the Idea of more RB on non HUD tables, and was kinda getting used to it too |
| |
|
|
1
| |
HEM hud was already updated as of a day or two ago, not sure about PT3, but it is working for HEM. |
|
|
1
|
Fujikura United States. Jul 04 2009 20:40. Posts 1795 | | |
Just download the latest beta of HEM (if you're using HEM that is). It will fix the HUD for the new tables... not sure about PT3 |
|
| aka SouL)Z(Isadie and SouL)P(Fujikura | |
|
|
|
Contact Users: 698 Active, 1 Logged in - Time: 06:59
,
,
,
,