NL10 squeeze attempt

Submitted by : joLin

PokerStars Game #21197795583: Hold'em No Limit ($0.05/$0.10) - 2008/10/14 17:59:44 ET
Table 'Lachesis III' 6-max Seat #3 is the button
Seat 1: mabalasek ($7.35 in chips)
Seat 2: Tesla38 ($4.05 in chips)
Seat 3: csnmf ($10.75 in chips)
Seat 4: A_Rocca ($1.90 in chips)
Seat 5: bombenbauer ($10.80 in chips)
Seat 6: Hero ($9.75 in chips)
A_Rocca: posts small blind $0.05
bombenbauer: posts big blind $0.10

Holecards(Odds)
Dealt to Hero
Hero : raises $0.30 to $0.40
mabalasek: calls $0.40
Tesla38: folds
csnmf: folds
A_Rocca: raises $1.50 to $1.90 and is all-in
bombenbauer: folds
Hero : raises $7.85 to $9.75 and is all-in
mabalasek: calls $6.95 and is all-in
Uncalled bet ($2.40) returned to Hero

Flop(Odds) (Pot : $16.70)

   

Turn(Odds) (Pot : $16.70)

   

River (Pot : $16.70)

   

Showdown
Hero : shows (high card Ace)
mabalasek: shows (three of a kind, Fives)
mabalasek collected $10.35 from side pot
A_Rocca: mucks hand
mabalasek collected $5.55 from main pot

Summary
Total pot $16.70 Main pot $5.55. Side pot $10.35. | Rake $0.80
Board  
Seat 1: mabalasek showed and won ($15.90) with three of a kind, Fives
Seat 2: Tesla38 folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 3: csnmf (button) folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 4: A_Rocca (small blind) mucked
Seat 5: bombenbauer (big blind) folded before Flop
Seat 6: Hero showed and lost with high card Ace

depends on A_Rocca's stats but i'd generally muck it here unless hes been very active

are we scared of having one person behind who might call and make it 3 way?

we are not really scared of a 79/27 to act behind. I like your play. (assuming the shortstack has a really wild range, which most have at NL10 because they are fish)

nah this is fine since the callers range is just so huge and arocca is shortstacking 10nl so hes prob not much to worry about either

dont think youre gonna lose/win much in this spot really

this isnt a squeeze, more an isolation shove

squeezes dont work at NL10