1
 |
studmufflynn   United States. Oct 06 2008 21:18. Posts 38 | | | |
|
|
1
 |
failsafe   United States. Oct 06 2008 21:34. Posts 1071 | | |
i think this is 100% fine. i really prefer you checking back the river here. 9's are now beating you. draws aren't paying you. he probably doesn't have a jack and his entire range of kings either splits with you (doesn't fold) or beats you (you valuetown yourself) |
|
|
1
 |
TallyHo   Malaysia. Oct 07 2008 05:55. Posts 384 | | |
well played if you dont know him |
| |
|
|
1
| |
i dont think that you can get value out of anything here. Notice that if he called with weaker king its split pot now, your t high doesnt play. |
|
|
1
 |
Sicks Macks   United States. Oct 07 2008 19:58. Posts 3929 | | |
If he would have called this with jacks and 9s then you'll get a better spot later |
| |
|
|
1
 |
JoeDeertay   United States. Oct 08 2008 13:23. Posts 1730 | | |
I think you played it perfectly fine. The only thing you might have done differently was check behind the turn to maybe get some value on the river or draw against a better K and not getting worse draws to fold or something (although I think betting like you did was better), but overwall you get an A+ on this hand imo. |
|
| Variance has a big brother named doomswitch. - edzwoo | |
|
|
1
 |
JoeDeertay   United States. Oct 08 2008 13:24. Posts 1730 | | |
Actually I didn't even notice the straight draws you had so I'd say it's def a snapbet on the turn here, even if he has a better K. |
|
| Variance has a big brother named doomswitch. - edzwoo | |
|
|
1
 |
SPEWTARD   Peru. Oct 08 2008 13:26. Posts 4307 | | | |
| |
|
|
1
 |
X rgfdxm   United States. Oct 08 2008 14:21. Posts 1514 | | |
I like this except that I'd bet bigger on the flop and turn. Your hand on the flop is good and on the turn is pretty monstrous, I'd want to be able to shove river here if you hit one of your zillion outs. |
|
|
|