 |
Kilay Netherlands. Sep 24 2008 05:03. Posts 1066 | | |
I am watching a CR video at the moment and they are talking about your non-showdown winnings (it's this microstakes series) and that it's standard for players on the lower stakes to have a negative line for their non-showdown winnings. So I am kind of wondering, do a lot of people have a negative line for their non-showdown winnings or is it standard for better players, also on higher limits, to be winning on their non-showdown pots.
Btw, I am playing 6-max only and also questioning this about 6-max play only. I always heard that it's almost impossible to have a positive non-showdown line for FR players but for 6-max a good player is winning in non-showdown pots...
|
|
| Thats what we call a two bagger, a bag over her head is required and a bag over your head in case hers falls off - MoneyMatt1 from 2+2 | |
|
|
 |
4Kingell United Kingdom. Sep 24 2008 05:18. Posts 241 | | | |
|
| “If you are going through hell, keep going.” - Churchill | |
|
|
|
Kilay Netherlands. Sep 24 2008 05:23. Posts 1066 | | |
Sorry, I suck balls at looking for threads and shit... |
|
| Thats what we call a two bagger, a bag over her head is required and a bag over your head in case hers falls off - MoneyMatt1 from 2+2 | |
|
|
|
gymnast Mexico. Sep 24 2008 06:52. Posts 348 | | |
the main idea is, NSW don't matter, just look at the total winnings |
|
| | 
|
|
