1
 |
Kilay   Netherlands. Aug 24 2008 17:43. Posts 1960 | | |
Submitted by :
Villain stats are 16/14 with a pretty high aggression percentage over all streets. He also has a steal percentage of 45 or so afer 40 hands which I didn't realise at the time and I think that's where I made my mistake.
I consider a 3 and possibly an 8 as outs here and watching at his VPIP/PFR (that's why I made a mistake, I didn't watch closely enough and see his steal percentage, widening his range) I thought this probably missed him and thought of c/r'ing flop as a semi-bluff. Now if I don't hit my cards but I do hit something and now I am not sure.
Killthemdonks was sweating me this session because I am an absolute tilt monkey and acted like a total idiot last session before this one so he had to keep me on the chains and slap me in the face (from the internets, gg) whenever I acted like a retard again...
Now here is where it gets interested, we started talking about it and he thinks you can profitably call here. I'll let him explain himself why. I think this is a clear cut fold. His range is either an overset which I really doubt is he's betting the turn. But then again, I squarely pit him on straights here basically... but would he have called my c/r with that considering maybe implied odds against a probably set (since that's like the cookie-cutter c/r'ing range of 90% of the 25NL'ers).
Can anyone formulate a nice accurte range here or whatever ??
|
|
|
1
 |
goodguysm   United States. Aug 24 2008 17:56. Posts 1051 | | |
You're totally overanalyzing this.
Call and hit a boat ship ship |
|
|
1
 |
emerce   Poland. Aug 24 2008 17:58. Posts 32 | | |
fold pf - out of position no set implied odds.
but as played:
turn - why put him on eights? i think you still have to get it in. he will raise flop with sets. he will bet flush draws all day. you hit your man on the turn. ship the money in the middle |
|
| for you are but a plankton in a sea of sharks | |
|
|
1
 |
goodguysm   United States. Aug 24 2008 18:10. Posts 1051 | | |
???
Since when did we fold low pp's against standard raises? |
|
|
1
 |
emerce   Poland. Aug 24 2008 18:26. Posts 32 | | |
since 44 is a marginal holding and plays bad out of position |
|
| for you are but a plankton in a sea of sharks | |
|
|
1
 |
jase   Australia. Aug 24 2008 19:41. Posts 1604 | | |
dont listen to emerce please |
|
|
1
| |
What the hell is going on in this thread.
You need 5:1 to call this if you're sure he has the straight. If you count his stack + the pot with your dead money, you're at 5:1 exactly, pretty much.
You can call here, barely... sometimes he doesn't have a str8, either.
Hm. More viewpoints plz. |
|
|
1
 |
LazyFisH   Australia. Aug 24 2008 20:46. Posts 686 | | |
Fold as played. Folding 44 OOP vs a steal is normal for the reasons emerce wrote. It's OK to 3bet 44 sometimes too in this situation. |
|
|
1
 |
jase   Australia. Aug 24 2008 22:05. Posts 1604 | | |
errr, sorry but 100bb deep, im calling a standard open from ANY position in ANY position... if ONLY for set odds |
|
| | Last edit: 24/08/2008 22:06 |
|
|
1
 |
skindzer   Chile. Aug 24 2008 22:30. Posts 299 | | |
| | On August 24 2008 16:56 goodguysm wrote:
You're totally overanalyzing this.
Call and hit a boat ship ship |
|
|
|
1
 |
emerce   Poland. Aug 25 2008 03:21. Posts 32 | | |
the problem with calling 44 oop only 100 deep is that he will rarely pay you off if you hit your set because his cutoff range is wide. you need him to stack off about half the time to make this profitable. if you continue on calling that pf and check fold every flop you miss this is going to be a spew. |
|
| for you are but a plankton in a sea of sharks | Last edit: 25/08/2008 03:27 |
|
|
1
 |
Kilay   Netherlands. Aug 25 2008 04:17. Posts 1960 | | |
| | On August 25 2008 02:21 emerce wrote:
the problem with calling 44 oop only 100 deep is that he will rarely pay you off if you hit your set because his cutoff range is wide. you need him to stack off about half the time to make this profitable. if you continue on calling that pf and check fold every flop you miss this is going to be a spew. |
That's why I don't just c/f whenever I miss but this time this even went wrong as well. Even then I am kind of thinking that I misplayed the turn which bothers me. I probably should have folded this preflop but as explained, I thought his range was tighter than it turned out to be. |
|
|
1
 |
Kilay   Netherlands. Aug 25 2008 04:19. Posts 1960 | | |
Btw, after I played the hand I did think I could have 3-bet this preflop as a semi-bluff idea, I can catch a 4 for the best hand and got good fold equity since I later noticed he actually was stealing with a pretty wide range. |
|
|
1
| |
warning: this may be the worse advice you ever read. 
I actually don't think calling here is good. Imo, on the turn, b/f or c/shoving or c/f are better options
Tons of other hands are calling the flop other than an 8, and actually I expect most 8 X (offsuit) to fold the flop to the 3bet since realistically they will be folding the turn around 80%(?) of the time.
I think TP + flush draws/TP/combo draws/two pair are mostly calling there, with two pair and combo draws being less likely candidates since these holdings in an aggro's hand are shoving that flop alot. (also sets are definitely not in his range imo)
Consider the line you took, and what your opponent most likely thinks you have because of it:
c/r, c looks a bit too much like a busted FD or bottom pair + FD, in a passive players hand imo. Considering that, I think the villains betting range on the turn is much wider than just an 8; especially if he is aggressive. Your hand just picked up a ton of equity but you basically just told him "I give up on the hand, you bet... I fold".
I'm not on my laptop now and dont have pokerstove here, so this is just a rough guesstimation of how we stand against his range if you c/shove the turn (actually...i did it backwards, its how his range stands against our hand). I put him holding an 8 55% of the time.

3betting this pre isn't a bad idea as well. but as played I'm betting, c/f or c/shoving the turn, depending on how spewy I feel 
|
|
| | Last edit: 25/08/2008 16:52 |
|
|
1
 |
Kilay   Netherlands. Aug 25 2008 17:26. Posts 1960 | | |
Wow, I like how you worked yourself there KTD, but I am quite interested, if you are bet/calling (and even c/shoving, I like c/shoving better because it widenes his betting range), what do you expect a call from... I am not sure... Maybe I just give way too much credit, I am not sure... |
|
|
1
| |
| | On August 25 2008 16:26 Kilay wrote:
Wow, I like how you worked yourself there KTD, but I am quite interested, if you are bet/Folding (and even c/shoving, I like c/shoving better because it widenes his betting range), what do you expect a call from... I am not sure... Maybe I just give way too much credit, I am not sure... |
fyp.
i expect him to fold to c/shove alot of the time. i do like the c/shove as well, since as u said...it gives him room to bluff with worse |
|
|
1
 |
ChromaX   Bulgaria. Aug 25 2008 20:13. Posts 392 | | |
dont tell me you folded that one...
if he's halfdecent TAG he would reraise flop with set
and the only 8X hands that he has are 88 98 and maybe T8
|
|
| AA is only a pair MUPPET - the guy who cracked my AA calling AI pf with QJ | |
|
|
1
 |
X rgfdxm   United States. Aug 25 2008 20:18. Posts 1514 | | |
How does he not have 2 pair here at least as often as an 8? Aren't at least some percent of overpairs in his range here, especially if he can think you have a FD? There's no way I can fold this for $6.50 more. |
|
|
1
 |
Kilay   Netherlands. Aug 26 2008 05:41. Posts 1960 | | |
Ok, I think I suck and probably should have c/shoved here... I think that's the best alternative to c/f'ing for earlier given reasons. |
|
|
1
| |
ye, though c/f isnt bad.
just calling is a big no no though. |
|
|
|