[NL10] stupid flop call?

I mainly called because he's so aggresive post flop... He's 14/9/11 120hands

Submitted by : k4ir0s

PokerStars Game #19062684063: Hold'em No Limit ($0.05/$0.10) - 2008/07/24 - 09:15:17 (ET)
Table 'Eurybates V' 9-max Seat #8 is the button
Seat 1: NME84 ($2 in chips)
Seat 2: N4gini ($32.90 in chips)
Seat 3: Don Salvo 72 ($7.95 in chips)
Seat 4: freakomatic ($1.85 in chips)
Seat 5: k4ir0s ($19.45 in chips)
Seat 6: Onkapa ($9.75 in chips)
Seat 8: PWCW ($4.65 in chips)
Seat 9: gurufred23 ($4.90 in chips)
gurufred23: posts small blind $0.05
NME84: posts big blind $0.10

Holecards(Odds)
Dealt to k4ir0s
Tonbert joins the table at seat #7
N4gini: raises $0.30 to $0.40
Don Salvo 72: calls $0.40
freakomatic: folds
k4ir0s : calls $0.40
Onkapa: folds
PWCW: calls $0.40
gurufred23: folds
NME84: folds

Flop(Odds) (Pot : $1.75)

   
N4gini: bets $1.35
Don Salvo 72: folds
k4ir0s : calls $1.35
PWCW: folds

Turn(Odds) (Pot : $4.45)

   
N4gini: bets $3.15
k4ir0s : calls $3.15

River (Pot : $10.75)

   
N4gini: bets $4
k4ir0s : raises $8 to $12
N4gini: calls $8

Showdown
k4ir0s : shows (a straight, Six to Ten)
N4gini: mucks hand
k4ir0s collected $33.05 from pot
Don Salvo 72 said, "wow vnh no1"
k4ir0s said, "ty"

Summary
Total pot $34.75 | Rake $1.70
Board  
Seat 1: NME84 (big blind) folded before Flop
Seat 2: N4gini mucked
Seat 3: Don Salvo 72 folded on the Flop
Seat 4: freakomatic folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 5: k4ir0s showed and won ($33.05) with a straight, Six to Ten
Seat 6: Onkapa folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 8: PWCW (button) folded on the Flop
Seat 9: gurufred23 (small blind) folded before Flop

go allin on river

it's fine to call in position and obviously to call the flop bet.
i'd raise the turn cause some cards on the river can kill your action such as any 7 or J.
and uh, shove that river

Raise turn, shove river.

lol

How is calling with the right odds stupid ?
>-<

I see u lack some very basic knowledge

pplus if ur going purely off of pot odds then ur wrong. but ur calling these in position because of massive implied odds u get from people like this guy who will pay u off when u hit.

On July 24 2008 17:24 bour420 wrote: pplus if ur going purely off of pot odds then ur wrong. but ur calling these in position because of massive implied odds u get from people like this guy who will pay u off when u hit.

Did i say pot odds or did i say odds ?
ofc i took a look at the stack sizes when i made my statement

pplus... the point hes putting a thread up here is for advice, and i see that you have not provided any real advice, which you have also done before on my own threads; just harsh criticism that doesnt seem to have any direction

good call, great implied odds + backdoor flushdraw

On July 25 2008 01:11 rockman255 wrote: pplus... the point hes putting a thread up here is for advice, and i see that you have not provided any real advice, which you have also done before on my own threads; just harsh criticism that doesnt seem to have any direction

I gave advice but it seems u fail to see it ?
He should concern himself with basic poker knowledge about odds ( pot odds , implied odds , reversed implied odds etc)

i think this is probably the best tipp u could give

I also stated that this is a call cause he has massive implied odds with the deep stack sizes ...

so where are my posts not going in any direction ?