100nl top pair + oesd...

Submitted by : tokeweed

Seat 1: _Fast_ $125.38
Seat 2: Germack00 $101.50
Seat 3: Hero $100.00
Seat 4: BorroBer $138.95
_Fast_ posts the small blind of $0.50
Germack00 posts the big blind of $1.00
BorroBer is the button
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to Hero
Hero raises $3.50
BorroBer calls $3.50
_Fast_ calls $3.50
Germack00 folds
*** FLOP ***
_Fast_ bets $11.50
Hero raises $33.00
BorroBer folds
_Fast_ calls $33.00
*** TURN ***
_Fast_ checks

Well you either jam the turn or check and give him a free card, the fact he donks lead the flop into 2 people makes me think he's not on a draw since you say he's kinda passive and would be more inclined into check/calling his draws. I don't hate checking here because he's not folding a lot of his range to your turn shove.

This is actually pretty hard because he could have hands like QJ/QT/Spadedraw which you want value from but at the same time he could've flopped a straight or something. In the moment I probably check behind and see what happens on the river. If it blanks and he checks to me I probably valuebet like 1/3 pot.

Lead/call on this kind of board is never nut type hands imo, its almost always some combodraw or pair+fd or str8 draw, Id bet/call here since you are not gonna like all rivers and his hands looks drawy.

you should only check behind if you think your flop raise was an outrageous spew

kna mean

On July 24 2008 05:11 [vital]Myth wrote: you should only check behind if you think your flop raise was an outrageous spew kna mean

why is that? spew in what sense? like we're not getting value from worse and never folding out better???

On July 24 2008 09:01 collegesucks wrote: Show nested quote + On July 24 2008 05:11 [vital]Myth wrote: you should only check behind if you think your flop raise was an outrageous spew kna mean why is that? spew in what sense? like we're not getting value from worse and never folding out better???

If he was raising for value on the flop the turn doesnt change anything so he should bet again, if he doesnt think he gets called by worse he shouldnt have raised the flop.

ah of course..

that seems to be missing that worse hands could call the raise on flop, then get more info and fold those same calling hands to further bet on turn , no?

On July 24 2008 11:33 Minsk wrote: that seems to be missing that worse hands could call the raise on flop, then get more info and fold those same calling hands to further bet on turn , no?

such as what hands?

On July 24 2008 05:11 [vital]Myth wrote: you should only check behind if you think your flop raise was an outrageous spew kna mean

nice post