1
 |
DaEm0niCuS United States. Jul 06 2008 17:17. Posts 3292 | | |
Is it possible to have a 30 inch monitor(samsung 305T) at like 2560x1800 resolution instead of 2560x1600? has anyone ever done this? could it ruin monitor? |
|
|
1
 |
EmKey Poland. Jul 06 2008 17:43. Posts 643 | | |
i havent tried that but if it would work im guessing it would be easier done on crt monitors, they are way more flexible in terms of parameters than lcds
oh and it wont work on higher resolutions than maximum res for the given monitor, its has to be downsized |
|
| redefining weak/tight since 2006 | Last edit: 06/07/2008 17:44 |
|
|
1
 |
Bejamin1 Canada. Jul 06 2008 17:50. Posts 7042 | | |
If you find the right drivers for your video card you can sometimes get different resolutions than what your standard is. Shouldn't hurt it IMO. |
|
| Sorry dude he Jason Bourned me. -Johnny Drama | |
|
|
1
 |
Breeze Bulgaria. Jul 06 2008 18:36. Posts 802 | | |
Your display has exactly 2560x1600 physical pixels, it can emulate lower resolutions by sort of stretching the image (and blurring it in the process) but haven't heard of emulating a higher resolution yet... there's no way to REALLY see 1800 pixels vertical when you have just 1600 physical pixels, it would be an approximation with losses |
|
| My work is of high quality, cheap and fast. Pick only two of those though. | |
|
|
1
|
lachlan Australia. Jul 06 2008 18:39. Posts 6991 | | |
im not sure if u can, but i think u have to use the nativeresolution or it will look kind of noobish with overlapping pixels or smethin |
| |
|
|
1
 |
ggplz Sweden. Jul 06 2008 19:20. Posts 16784 | | |
havent seen a graphics card that supports > 2560x1600 |
|
| if poker is dangerous to them i would rank sports betting as a Kodiak grizzly bear who smells blood after you just threw a javelin into his cub - RaiNKhAN | |
|
|
1
|
Joe Czech Republic. Jul 06 2008 23:45. Posts 5987 | | |
| | On July 06 2008 17:36 Breeze wrote:
Your display has exactly 2560x1600 physical pixels, it can emulate lower resolutions by sort of stretching the image (and blurring it in the process) but haven't heard of emulating a higher resolution yet... there's no way to REALLY see 1800 pixels vertical when you have just 1600 physical pixels, it would be an approximation with losses |
what he said |
|
| there is a light at the end of the tunnel... (but sometimes the tunnel is long and deep as hell) | |
|
|
1
|
Joe Czech Republic. Jul 06 2008 23:50. Posts 5987 | | |
But there are some monitors with higher than 2560x1600 (full HD) resolution.
For example this one supports up to 3840x2400. |
|
| there is a light at the end of the tunnel... (but sometimes the tunnel is long and deep as hell) | Last edit: 06/07/2008 23:51 |
|
|
|
Contact Users: 825 Active, 0 Logged in - Time: 14:22
,
,
,
,