https://www.liquidpoker.net/


LP international    Contact            Users: 719 Active, 0 Logged in - Time: 09:15

[25NL] tough spot deepstack vs super loose/agr

New to LiquidPoker? Register here for free!
Forum Index > Hand Discussion
vat   Bulgaria. Jun 26 2008 09:42. Posts 4

First, I would like to thank goodguysm, myth, and Semper for the feedback on the previous hand that I posted.

Here is a much trickier hand that I played yesterday. I posted it in the Hands section with the intention to provide some background in the SS forum, got some replies there which I agree with should I have had no reads on the villain. He was a 50/35/6/120, with 0/33/66 f/c/r to cbet tricky bad player and the sole reason I was siting on the table for nearly 2 hours. I tried to be aggressive in the beginning only to have my light 3-bets called and then c/r on flop, my double barrels bluff-reraised on turn, etc. I know, tighten up preflop and wait to get a real hand and value bet the shit out of him, but somehow almost everytime I did that he (unluckily) happened to fold preflop or on flop. My position on the table was such that I was oop 66% of the time, and every time I tried to steal the blinds light he was either BB or SB and cold calling me. Basically I couldn't steal or cbet with air, which made my range and my tag play way too obvious.

The reads I had on him were the following:

1) He doesn't slowplay and will 3-bet with sets
2) When he has a solid hand, he tends to value bet/ 3bet reasonably (2/3 to psb) on flop/turn, and usually bets 1/2 pot on river
3) He is not a solid player (tried to bluff out a pot-committed shortie, shoved preflop with 77 vs a tag (and won vs AK), showed his cards every time his bluff won him the hand)

My image was tight/agressive on early streets and passive/weak on later streets. He was to some extent positionally aware and to some extent adjusted to the table, so I had reasons to believe that he is aware of my image.

Here is the hand:

Submitted by : vat

PokerStars Game #18384953842: Hold'em No Limit ($0.10/$0.25) - 2008/06/25 - 21:45:04 (ET)
Table 'Altair IV' 6-max Seat #6 is the button
Seat 2: FulTymAmatur ($2.10 in chips)
Seat 3: Hero ($70.10 in chips)
Seat 4: davidabc2k2 ($7.95 in chips)
Seat 5: CoachThijs ($25.20 in chips)
Seat 6: Villain ($69.95 in chips)
FulTymAmatur: posts small blind $0.10
Hero : posts big blind $0.25

Holecards
Dealt to Hero Ah9h
davidabc2k2: calls $0.25
CoachThijs: folds
Villain: raises $0.75 to $1
FulTymAmatur: folds
Hero : calls $0.75
davidabc2k2: raises $0.75 to $1.75
Villain: calls $0.75
Hero : calls $0.75

Flop (Pot : $5.35)

   9d8c3h
Hero : checks
davidabc2k2: checks
Villain: bets $3
Hero : raises $3 to $6
davidabc2k2: folds
Villain: calls $3

Turn (Pot : $17.35)

   9d8c3h3s
Hero : checks
Villain: bets $9
Hero : calls $9

River (Pot : $35.35)

   9d8c3h3sAd
EquityEmpire joins the table at seat #1
Hero : checks
EquityEmpire is sitting out
Villain: bets $53.20 and is all-in
EquityEmpire has returned
Hero : ???



Now here is how I played on each street:

Prefop: Normally I would fold this (or occasionally 3-bet IP), but I was trying to balance my range/being slightly on tilt/hoping to stack him with an unexpected hand. I hate to play limp/reraise sort of hands (since they are usually monsters), and would have given up on flop if the 3rd guy had shown any aggression.

Flop: I have a TPTK vs a preflop limp-raiser and a super aggro ATC player, so I don't donkbet. After davidabc checks it becomes fairly obvious he missed the flop (or he is slowplaying, in which case I fold if he shows aggression), and the villian throws his usual bet in position. I reraise for value/information, since I pretty sure villian will 3-bet with set/two pair hands, ocassionally will fold with air, and will call with draws/marginal hands.

Turn: Villian tends to bluff a lot on turn, and the board is scary. A bet here will def get reraised, and I don't want to play for stacks with 9 pair TK, so I try to keep the pot small by c/c here. If he has a set, his line will most likely be bet 2/3 bet/shove river. The 1/2 bet means most likely he has air/pair/draw, and the villian most likely puts me on pair/draw since I tend to lead with my strong hands.

River: I have 2 pair, and I've shown weakness vs agro player who I am either really ahead or really behind from. If I bet chances are he folds with air/shoves with air, or shoves with a set, giving me no useful information. I try to keep the pot small. My line here is c/ call a small bet, fold to 1/2 to psb. However, he shoves. There is no way it is for value, since I've shown weakness and my line here from his perspective is most likely c/f, and the A on river gives him the perfect scare card for a bluff. However, maybe I should wait for a better spot to try to stack him?

Result:

+ Show Spoiler +



I really have troubles adjusting vs this kind of opponents. Against a loose weak player you raise lightly preflop to isolate and take it with c-bet. Against a loose/passive player you tighten up prefop and value bet. However super loose/agressive opponents put me on tilt. I can't steal, I can't 3-bet light, I can't c-bet with air, and strong hands happen rarely. Any tips on how to play them, and tips regarding the hand in general? Disclaimer: I am fairly new to poker, so any criticism on my thought process/play will be highly appreciated.

Facebook Twitter

4Kingell   United Kingdom. Jun 27 2008 06:51. Posts 1453

I had the same on one table last night except one step further - had 2 Very LAG guys one position off to my left (BB and UTG when I was on button). Almost every time I open raised in position I was called by both of them at best (even when one was UTG!) or 3bet by one of them - as a result I was having to lay down a good percentage of hands post flop (or marginal ones pre when 3bet). After about 20/30 mins I just started open limping hands I would normally open raise with in position e.g. connectors, K10s/Q10s etc and standard open raising with premium hands - obviously mixing it up a little as well.

It turned out ot be a pretty profitable if ugly way to play Vs these guys. When I limped they only ever raised with good hands, and when raising with premium hands I didn't care if they 3bet or called. Post flop they were easy to play because they would bet regardless of holding and if I stayed passive until I was "sure" I was ahead I minimized the damage and maximized value from it.

I'm not saying this is the best way to play - like you I would be interested to hear more experienced thoughts - but it worked last night for me in this situation.

If you're going to cr the flop I assume you haven't done it to him before as he is always going to call $3 in a $14 pot? I don't think that gives you much info - either CR more or C/C.
Turn - no problem there for me - controlling pot size against lunatic
River - if you've made it this far and you hit the A I would have to call + his line makes no sense to me - your perceived weakness may have pushed him to the shove but it is a dumb bet from him imo. What the hell are you going to get this far with? A fair % is going to be Ax. That's why these guys are profitable to play against imo - you just need to adapt a little - and put up with a bit of frustration!!

If you know the enemy and know yourself you need not fear the results of a hundred battles. Sun Tzu  

TalentedTom    Canada. Jun 27 2008 09:33. Posts 20070

100% easy snapcall... very easy given your read "He doesn't slowplay" + he can actually be value betting worse

Our deepest fear is not that we are inadequate. Our deepest fear is that we are powerful beyond measure. It is our light not our darkness that most frightens us and as we let our own lights shine we unconsciously give other people permision to do the same 

vat   Bulgaria. Jun 27 2008 11:59. Posts 4

Thanks for the replies 4Kingell and TalentedTom. I have c/r him before and got him to fold, and I've seen him getting reraised when he had a set and he snap 3-bet vs a tag/passive, so for me it was basically like asking "do you have a set here/strong hand or not?". However I agree it was inconsistent with my "I don't want to play for stacks with low TPTK" line, and this results in an ugly "$3 in a $14 pot" situation. A c/c on flop would probably have been better with only a weak tptk.

As far as playing vs this kind of lags, I came to pretty much the same conclusion - limp more preflop with sc and low pp in position as oppose to raising them (although this guy was 50/35 so seeing many cheap flops wasn't an option). When you hit, you get paid, and being IP you have some control over the size of the pot. However, I am sure there has got to be a better way, although it might require much better reading/postflop skills than the ones I currently have. If someone more experienced cares to elaborate, I will be thankful.

 Last edit: 27/06/2008 12:09

SemPeR   Canada. Jun 27 2008 12:44. Posts 2288

very well thought out play. I was going to say flat the flop bet, but you've got all that worked out.

I think flatting is fine, but the hand might have played out differently had you done that; that david guy probably would have overcalled. Puts you in a shitty spot on the turn especially if he donks out after you (but before main vill) to find out where he's at.

The minraise here works pretty well because it doesn't bloat the pot as much.


 



Poker Streams

















Copyright © 2026. LiquidPoker.net All Rights Reserved
Contact Advertise Sitemap