PT3 vs PT2

So since now people had time using PT3. What do u guys reckon is it worth it, or is PT2 doign good enough job?

PT3 is garbage.

DO NOT GET IT YET.

hopefully they patch it up, but as of right now it's a heaping pile of shit imo.

On June 19 2008 04:59 nolan wrote: PT3 is garbage. DO NOT GET IT YET. hopefully they patch it up, but as of right now it's a heaping pile of shit imo.

what in gods name are you talking about?!?! i havent had a single problem with PT3 at all, and its like 10x faster than PT2 and much better overall.. the only negative side is that they should five a FAQ to configure the HUD which can take u a while to figure out how to set it up as u want.

agree with nolan

I like PT3 except when the HUD occasionally stops displaying stats or freezes

PT3 sucks. It felt slow as hell, and the HUD was garbage compared to the PAHUD setup you could make on PT2.

pt3 is fine.

it crashes more then pt2 did but i prefer it's interface.

pt3 is ok but still needs patching. crashes a bit too often and i really think it has missed to import a few hands for me and i dont know how to retrieve it.

pt2 was pretty stable but it was way too slow in every department

Weird, it has crashed on me once and i have a 600k+ hand database so im really pushing it, agreed that the HUD should improve and im sure it will in the next version, but im still wondering why nolan and ggplz say it sucks, care to elaborate?


I imported 600k hands at a very good speed (less than 1h of importing) and in PT2 trying to import something like 50k hands at once would take over 1h and it would crash.

does anyone elses PT3 layout fuck up whenever they resize the window while viewing the 'general' tab?

@Baal, The hud really needs a lot of work and generally im not impressed by the layout of the info inside the tabs. Also it just feels pretty unnatural to use and i dislike that a lot.

just in case ppl are finding PT2 slow, make sure u google how to convert to postgresql it makes PT2 million times faster. no comment on PT3, havent used it or bought it, probably wont until ppl say that the hud is equally as good as pahud.

only real advantage i see for PT3 besides asthetics is the 3bet/4bet stats which sound pretty invaluable

On June 19 2008 06:51 lachlan wrote: just in case ppl are finding PT2 slow, make sure u google how to convert to postgresql it makes PT2 million times faster. no comment on PT3, havent used it or bought it, probably wont until ppl say that the hud is equally as good as pahud. only real advantage i see for PT3 besides asthetics is the 3bet/4bet stats which sound pretty invaluable

i used PT2 with postgresql and PT3 is still 10x faster

On June 19 2008 04:59 nolan wrote: PT3 is garbage. DO NOT GET IT YET. hopefully they patch it up, but as of right now it's a heaping pile of shit imo.

qft

sometimes it crashes 1-2 times during a session and that's annoying as hell

Fuck it i won't pay again for basicaly the same thing with a better interface, i don't even exploit 15% of PT2 so far.

Sloooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooowwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww

i still use PT2 cause PT3 hud is retarded
btw does any1 know if we are still unable to resize PT3 hud stats?

On June 19 2008 07:03 Baal wrote: Show nested quote + On June 19 2008 06:51 lachlan wrote: just in case ppl are finding PT2 slow, make sure u google how to convert to postgresql it makes PT2 million times faster. no comment on PT3, havent used it or bought it, probably wont until ppl say that the hud is equally as good as pahud. only real advantage i see for PT3 besides asthetics is the 3bet/4bet stats which sound pretty invaluable i used PT2 with postgresql and PT3 is still 10x faster

yes

pt3's update speed is monsterrific.

PT3 does not show my stats on a certain table everytime I guy leaves a table. Also, HUD is fucking unreadable and transparent... it uses a lot of space and even though you can resize the letters, its still sux.

I still use PT2

I still use PT2 as well. I don't see PT3 as an upgrade at all.