NL200 QQ wut to do

No history on the villain. He plays about 19/9. I really don't see what he has here that we beat. Or am I paranoid? How would you have played this hand on the flop?

EDIT: On second thought why did I know 3bet this on flop?

Submitted by : phexac

PokerStars Game #17495703766: Hold'em No Limit ($1/$2) - 2008/05/17 - 14:26:05 (ET)
Table 'Cebriones II' 6-max Seat #6 is the button
Seat 1: AlexanderT ($173.30 in chips)
Seat 3: Pete81 ($309.70 in chips)
Seat 4: S_System ($207.45 in chips)
Seat 5: Sweet.kr ($847.30 in chips)
Seat 6: Hero ($217.10 in chips)
AlexanderT: posts small blind $1
Helox: is sitting out
Pete81: posts big blind $2

Holecards
Dealt to Hero
Helox leaves the table
S_System: folds
Sweet.kr: folds
Hero : raises $5 to $7
AlexanderT: folds
Pete81: calls $5

Flop (Pot : $15.00)

   
Pete81: checks
Hero : bets $11
Pete81: raises $19 to $30
Hero : calls $19

Turn (Pot : $75.00)

   
Pete81: bets $44
Hero :

your line is acceptable as is 3betting the flop, as long as you know he will play AJ/KJ aggressively like this and commit or you know he will commit shove with bad draws. now I fold unless he can have total air here (i don't think ppl at nl200 are capable, and those who are bluff all the time and are easily spotted).

God this might just sound crazy but sometimes I just fold the flop to a 19/9

But most of the time I superman these hoes

so what u put him on then ? i dont see him having AJ/KJ/QJ beacuse he would rather bet large or check turn after call on flop

He could have FD or set flop and thats why its easy fold... I never see anyone ahead here with QQ vs 19/9

My logic is good ?