midstakes players moving down in my area

after reading maynard's doom post last time which pretty much bummed me out a little even if it was only partly true but didnt really see it for myself, along comes last night and this morning's session and along with the regulars i have come to love (lol) at the table, comes these 400nl and 200nl FR multitablers weaktite and studboy at 100nl. omg so much fun now that the tables are comprised of:
9max FR:
*me = super nitbag
*smartfab
*spoonitnow
*mixmixmix
*random shortstack donkey like 20bbs
*fatdan44
*weak tite
*some random asshole lper who reads my blog/hands trying to outplay me with hands in position 3betting faggot (lol)
*studboy
*prairie hawk

now where the fuck will the money come from?!? yeah good times lolol

obv me prolly lol

yeh

improve your game other than full ring. or improve your full ring game and crush the regulars. what else is there to be said?

Wth, didn't expect Weak Tite to be at NL100 full ring (especially the full ring part) :0

whos the 3betting asshole?

I saw weak tite shortstacking NL200 recently

played with weak tite not too long ago 2/4 6max on FTP

hes bad as usual

he shouldve kept his clown icon.. suits his shortstacking ass perfectly.

On May 12 2008 01:02 FrinkX wrote: played with weak tite not too long ago 2/4 6max on FTP hes bad as usual

someone once told me that you're an internet cop

eyyyyyy yoooo

dude, no offence but you seem to complain more than you actually play.
if you're complaining about the toughness of the tables on 100nl FR u should quit now, cause it aint gonna get any better as you move up.
even @ 200nl i have to admit there would be some tables that are not that profitable to play on, but you just have to use a little bit of table selection to solve this.

so quit crying and more playing imo *shrugs*

On May 12 2008 01:32 MezmerizePLZ wrote: Show nested quote + On May 12 2008 01:02 FrinkX wrote: played with weak tite not too long ago 2/4 6max on FTP hes bad as usual someone once told me that you're an internet cop eyyyyyy yoooo

yea but YO MAMAS ON CRACK ROCK

and your a eyyyyyy yoooooo

lol I kinda understand about 400nl being tough but 100nl is a joke

If you think 200NL is tough only play poker at peak time. Your winrate will increase atleast by 1.5

On May 12 2008 02:54 AndrewSong wrote: lol I kinda understand about 400nl being tough but 100nl is a joke If you think 200NL is tough only play poker at peak time. Your winrate will increase atleast by 1.5

its all relative.. to me 400nl is a joke and to peachy the games i find tough are a joke. the point is theyre getting quite a bit tougher than they were before

true. but what i meant is that there is no game in 200NL where you would leave because tables are all full of 'super solid professionals'. I think if your not better then half the regulars in your stakes you should move down. I played 200NL even when i had 100buyin for 400NL game just because my pt/bb was more then double.

who cares if you are a 1bb winner in a (relatively) tough 200nl game, why would you stick around when you can join one with fish for 5bb

my friend...

in poker it is essential to practice daily to attain familiarity, treating them (bad beats, suck outs, losing a lot) as ordinary affairs, so the mind remains calm and unchanged...

this is what you lack...

and oh...

but if you practice daily for two years and still couldn't attain familiarity especially at small stakes, then you're fucked!

ok guys i will crush everyone now...hihihihi

Yesterday (Sunday) at Party 400NL, well over half of the tables were full of only 19/17 regs, an ok shortstacker and maybe 1 idiot shortstack until the european evening. Now I'm sure that these games are ridiculously soft to a higher player, and there's loads of scope for money still since the regs are aggro as hell when they play a hand, but has it always been this dry of fish? That's not a rhetorical question - only been at this limit for a couple months.