https://www.liquidpoker.net/


LP international    Contact            Users: 806 Active, 0 Logged in - Time: 08:21

Your variance (pokertracker stats) - Page 3

New to LiquidPoker? Register here for free!
Forum Index > Main Poker
  First 
  < 
  1 
  2 
 3 
  4 
  > 
  Last 
  All 
CrownRoyal   United States. May 07 2008 12:38. Posts 11386

lol, my headsup deviation is 100/bb100

WHAT IS THIS 

handbanana21   United States. May 07 2008 12:42. Posts 3037

i have no clue.. hoping someone will clear that up.


The72o   Zimbabwe. May 07 2008 13:13. Posts 6112


  On May 07 2008 10:56 Catul wrote:
Show nested quote +


Add a space after the '3.', he didn't put any in 1/2 either


too lazy to hit space that many times lol

A Hard Way to Make an Easy Living 

Critterer   United Kingdom. May 07 2008 13:13. Posts 5337

standard deviation, its a measure of statistical dispersion.

LudaHid: dam.ned dam.ned dam.ned. LudaHid: dam.ned northwooden as..hole 

bane   United States. May 07 2008 13:20. Posts 2379

1. NL10 FR
2. 77k hands
3. 88.74 big bets/100


CrownRoyal   United States. May 07 2008 13:46. Posts 11386

so in order to have a huge winrate you have to have higher variance? Why did someone say earlier in the thread that its better than have a low number?

WHAT IS THIS 

CrownRoyal   United States. May 07 2008 13:47. Posts 11386

and obviously if you have a huge winrate you're pushing smaller edges to squeeze out that winrate so you're gonna have a bigger amount of short term variance (100 hands)

This statistic seems useless at best to me because it doesn't really tell you anything

WHAT IS THIS 

Cutsss    France. May 07 2008 14:26. Posts 1198

1) 3/6 up to 50/100
2) 150k
3) 67bb/100

I believe in santa claus 

Loco   Canada. May 07 2008 15:28. Posts 21022

1) NL 200 - NL 400
2) 132K hands
3) 84 bb/100 std dev

fuck I should just sell some of my Pokemon cards, if no one stakes that is what I will have to do - lostaccount 

Bejamin1   Canada. May 07 2008 15:50. Posts 7042

1) PLO 25, 50, 100
2) 157k hands
3) 55bb/100

I'm surprised I would have thought it would be higher.

Sorry dude he Jason Bourned me. -Johnny Drama 

nolan   Ireland. May 07 2008 16:01. Posts 6205

1) 400-1000nl 70% FR, 30% 6m
2) 240k hands
3) 43.6021 big bets / 100.

wish i knew what that meant.

On September 08 2008 10:07 Baal wrote: my head is a gyroscope, your argument is invalid 

NMcNasty    United States. May 07 2008 16:02. Posts 2041

1) 5/10 and 10/20 (90% 6max, 10% fullring)
2) 102k
3) 39 bb/100


Kapol   Poland. May 07 2008 16:47. Posts 4696

1. NL25 - NL200
2. 273k
3. 38BB/10

BIBLE (Basic Instructions Before Leaving Earth) 

MaidenFan   United States. May 07 2008 17:23. Posts 450


  On May 07 2008 12:47 CrownRoyal wrote:
and obviously if you have a huge winrate you're pushing smaller edges to squeeze out that winrate so you're gonna have a bigger amount of short term variance (100 hands)

This statistic seems useless at best to me because it doesn't really tell you anything


It shows you how tight you're playing, the tighter you play the lower your variance (i'm assuming). Also you can more or less infer the level of competition from this number. If you play a generally tight game but your variance is high it might mean you're sitting in a tough game. (Once again I'm just assuming this, using my shitty logic, which could be wrong). But if it's right I think it's pretty interesting and not at all useless.

Let it roll. 

lostaccount   Canada. May 07 2008 18:10. Posts 6796

nl100-600
300k+
~30bb/100

Goodbye LP, thanks for everything 

matdon460   United States. May 07 2008 18:23. Posts 1089

95988 hands
1/2 and some 2/4 6 max
48.6BB/100

Of course it was a good shove, I won 

Baalim   Mexico. May 07 2008 20:18. Posts 34312

nut peddling nits.....

Ex-PokerStars Team Pro Online 

Pulda   Czech Republic. May 07 2008 20:59. Posts 446


  On May 07 2008 12:46 CrownRoyal wrote:
so in order to have a huge winrate you have to have higher variance? Why did someone say earlier in the thread that its better than have a low number?



You probably won't achieve a high winrate on higher stakes without having a high standard deviation, but for a given winrate, the smaller the deviation is, the better.


Pulda   Czech Republic. May 07 2008 21:07. Posts 446


  On May 07 2008 16:23 MaidenFan wrote:
It shows you how tight you're playing, the tighter you play the lower your variance (i'm assuming).


That's only true to a certain extent. For example in the sample I posted, my SD was only at 31.1 for nl100, but I was playing a rather LAG style (at least for FR that is - stats around 19/15). I guess the level of competition plays a bigger role.


whamm!   Albania. May 07 2008 21:40. Posts 11625

fucking lucksacks lol


 
  First 
  < 
  1 
  2 
 3 
  4 
  > 
  Last 
  All 



Poker Streams

















Copyright © 2026. LiquidPoker.net All Rights Reserved
Contact Advertise Sitemap