New Prop bet

So me and MezmerizePLZ have been talking about another prop bet, noting is serious yet, we have just been tossing the idea around and id like to hear your guys opinion on this one.

The idea is that Mez would bet me that i couldnt spend X amount of time in the wynn poker room. The player could get up to go to the bathroom (not sure if there is one connected to the poker room). Other then that the player wouldnt be able to miss more then 1 orbit.

Obv where ever the time line is drawn really affects the odds, we were thinking something like 60hrs and 4:1 or 3:1. This is really the part where id like your input, how long is to long? and what should the odds be?

With or without caffine?

u can have anything u can order at the poker table..

and i think it would be fair for the player to bring stuff in his pockets if he wants, or maybe a backpack.

60 hours? id take you up on that for sure giving 4:1

Dude I have done this for no money. 67 hours in my local casino and I was falling asleep in between hands and hallucinating.
But I mean Ted Forrest has 100 hour death matches vs 1 opponent?
Its easily achievable if you prepare and bring everything you will need. (Gum, deodorant, mouth wash, cologne, eat well, drink well)
And you have to have serious stamina. Go for runs and exercise while preparing for this. It depends on your history.
Personally I would take 4:1 - 4.5:1 on this bet minimum if I had to do this again.

Im pretty sure I could of made it to 70 hours though.
I had no money left on me because I had to stake 5 players that day from my huge wins.
Then i bled the 3 buy ins i had left on me while being card dead and falling asleep.

I only had 1 red bull and 1 cup of coffee too.
All on orange juice and poker highs.

On May 02 2008 01:06 milkman wrote: Other then that the player wouldnt be able to miss more then 1 orbit.

over 60+ hrs would be sick sick sick

i have never stayed awake for more than 30 hrs and i probably can never ever do 60+ for any kind of money...

On May 02 2008 01:52 SakiSaki wrote: 60 hours? id take you up on that for sure giving 4:1

fist pump snap call

yo this is actually seems extremely hard
i've never stayed up for more than 48 hours
obv there are serious help implications behind this
no sleep for 60 hrs wtf

60 hours.. wtf doesnt it close for at least a few hours?

On May 02 2008 07:00 ggplz wrote: 60 hours.. wtf doesnt it close for at least a few hours?

its vegas

On May 02 2008 01:57 NiagaraPoker wrote: Dude I have done this for no money. 67 hours in my local casino and I was falling asleep in between hands and hallucinating.

ahahaha

god more than a 10 hour session of live sucks

you pussies need to do some better prop bets.

like milkman fighting a 3 badgers armed with only a wiffle bat.

that said, 60 hours is fucking nuts.

ya 60 hours seems almost impossible but i guess this is why its a prop bet

what if the table breaks?

will this go down over wsop? pretty interesting bet. btw i'm pretty sure there aren't any bathrooms in the poker room and the closest one is either by the lobby on that side or fairly far down the path if you just walk out and take a left.

MILKMAN, ALL YOU HAVE TO DO IS POP E'S OR PILLS , AND YOUR GOOD TO GO. COKE OR CRACK WILL ALSO HELP

60hrs is to much, i'd say 48hrs 3-1 sounds fair, not allowed to bring anything extra with him

Milk, there's no way.

On May 02 2008 16:11 RiKD wrote: will this go down over wsop? pretty interesting bet. btw i'm pretty sure there aren't any bathrooms in the poker room and the closest one is either by the lobby on that side or fairly far down the path if you just walk out and take a left.

yeah i dont remember it being that far though and you'll definitely never miss a whole orbit even for number 2s, live poker is slow.

interesting bet indeed but Q should stipulate the minimum stakes that milkman has to play and the minimum he has to be sitting with at all times to make it really interesting. not to make those too high or anything, just to make sure he actually does have to try to play poker the whole time otherwise he can move to the lowest table and sit shortstacked and autopilot, which almost turns it into just a competition of how long he can stay awake instead of how long he can play live poker.

the longest i did was like 30-35 hours and i was pretty killed at the end lol. i dont think i coulda lasted 15 hours more, certainly not 25

On May 03 2008 15:28 Floofy wrote: the longest i did was like 30-35 hours and i was pretty killed at the end lol. i dont think i coulda lasted 15 hours more, certainly not 25

did you loosen your bow-tie and cummerbund for extra comfort?

lol you think the 4:1 will even be worth it?

i'd imagine after like 45 hrs you'd totally lose focus and that might completely rape your winrate

Do you automatically lose if you have a horrible downswing and go busto?

I think that people who are not gonna bet, should not post stuff like

'i did that easily one time' or 'thats not hard'

it spoils the bet, if people wanna bet let them.

If you're not gonna bet, don't be so anxious to be part of the whole thing nit.

On May 03 2008 16:39 byrnesam wrote: Show nested quote + On May 03 2008 15:28 Floofy wrote: the longest i did was like 30-35 hours and i was pretty killed at the end lol. i dont think i coulda lasted 15 hours more, certainly not 25 did you loosen your bow-tie and cummerbund for extra comfort?

yea maybe i should do 60 hours in a tuxedo

ive been thinkin more and more about this bet, its deff more risky then the pantry. so 4:1 is a good rate i think.


shoud be fun, ill let everyone know via the blog if i start takin bets, im def gonna allow lower limit bets this time, i think its alot like staking ppl in tournys, its more fun to watch when u have a piece

hmm aren't you as good as drunk after 40ish hours of no sleep...should be bad for the winrate

I think playing sleep deprived may be worse than playing drunk

lol make this in a tuxedo and im in... just for the hillarity

i'll take action on this.

tuxed, top hat, cane and a monocular... you know dressed pretty much like mr peanut and im getting some action so is a lot of ppl, think about it

on the srs part, there has to be a min stake, min winnings and tuxedo

wear some shades with that tux obv

ROFL i second the Mr peanut outfit idea.

On May 06 2008 23:50 Baal wrote: ROFL i second the Mr peanut outfit idea.

Now anything less will be un-exceptable.