 |
FrinkX   United States. Apr 24 2008 14:59. Posts 5461 | | |
unless you do mini raising here as a bluff as well as value dont do it its way too transparent
fake misclicking doesnt work that often and u gotta do it in obscure situations. like flatting AA behind someone and instaminraising someones squeeze. it's an art |
| |
|
|
| |
| | On April 24 2008 14:59 FrinkX wrote:
unless you do mini raising here as a bluff as well as value dont do it its way too transparent
|
The times I instaminraise are very situation and usually because I figure they're going to respond to it by doing something stupid. I can bluff with it once in awhile with it but people will do really stupid shit as their brain explodes when you do it.
It has to be insta though. Like you're ready for them to 4bet you and have your mouse hovering over the spot. |
|
|
 |
FrinkX   United States. Apr 24 2008 15:58. Posts 5461 | | |
ya ofc it has to be insta
i just think redargoe will see through it unless u have done it to him before |
| |
|
|
 |
TalentedTom   Canada. Apr 24 2008 16:14. Posts 9540 | | |
hes either pot commited himself or hes straight bluffing and giving up on 90% of flops |
|
| A Handicapped parking sign does not signify that this spot is for handicapped people. It is actually in fact a warning, that the spot belongs to Chuck Norris and that you will be handicapped if you park there. | |
|
|
 |
TalentedTom   Canada. Apr 24 2008 16:15. Posts 9540 | | |
he plays 88+ for 100bb stacks like its his job, for 200bb he felts KK+/AK |
|
| A Handicapped parking sign does not signify that this spot is for handicapped people. It is actually in fact a warning, that the spot belongs to Chuck Norris and that you will be handicapped if you park there. | |
|
|
| |
| | On April 24 2008 15:58 FrinkX wrote:
ya ofc it has to be insta
i just think redargoe will see through it unless u have done it to him before |
You get extra EV for style though. |
|
|
 |
JYang   United States. Apr 24 2008 21:23. Posts 2396 | | |
isnt insta rep misclick raise like too polarized towards the range of ur good hands too much?
and the fact that u rarely misclick much in a 200+bb pot anyway...
too transparent? |
|
|
| |
| | On April 24 2008 21:23 JYang wrote:
isnt insta rep misclick raise like too polarized towards the range of ur good hands too much?
and the fact that u rarely misclick much in a 200+bb pot anyway...
too transparent? |
Yeh, and pushing 200bb isn't going to polarize anything, right?
You do it because they might do something stupid. You'd be surprised how much a minraise will make people's heads explode in the right spot. |
|
|
| |
You can make a lot of plays that are, on their face, transparent but are done to take advantage of the likelihood of stupidity/misinterpretation.
It's not like I'm advocating minraising vs somebody in a sane mind set. You do it to induce tilt or stupidity. Not because it's actually technically optimal. |
|
|
 |
FrinkX   United States. Apr 24 2008 23:55. Posts 5461 | | |
i have a problem with minraising here because redargoe is going to interpret it as 1 of 2 things, giving u a 50% (probably less cuz i certainly think he'll interpret it as exactly what u have) chance to get paid off. minraising here as a bluff would be pretty nice if u wanna go all metagame tricky etc blabla
imo just shoving or reraise commiting or whatever u want is far superior since it most certainly can be more than just AA that u have and he will stack off a bit lighter more often imo
i agree u most certainly can make transparent, obscure plays vs certain people and i dont think redargoe is one of them. i think these sort of plays should only be used if there is a high % chance that they'll get paid off (unless they are used more than once in a blue moon). |
| |
|
|
 |
n0rthf4ce   United States. Apr 25 2008 07:12. Posts 6100 | | | |
| |
|
|
|