KK vs the cleaner by thewh00sel

Okay so I decided to take a shot at 2-tabling some 5/10 today with a little table selection, and apart from thecleaner i thought this was a decent table until the shortstackers moved in. Anyways, I got into a hand with him and I just wanted people's opinions on how they'd play it. His image was very tight (like 15/11) and multitabling, and I was playing like 22/20 or so and hadn't shown down many hands and chipped up half a buy in or so off of other players.

Submitted by : thewh00sel

POKERSTARS GAME #16783733758: HOLD'EM NO LIMIT ($5/$10) - 2008/04/16 - 21:47:43 (ET)
Table 'Nerina III' 6-max Seat #2 is the button
Seat 1: TheCleaner11 ($2850 in chips)
Seat 2: Poly_Baller ($1045 in chips)
Seat 3: rut69 ($160 in chips)
Seat 4: zawaaa ($696.25 in chips)
Seat 5: Hero ($1504.55 in chips)
Seat 6: WizardOfAhhs ($250 in chips)
rut69: posts small blind $5
zawaaa: posts big blind $10

Holecards
Dealt to Hero
Hero : raises $20 to $30
WizardOfAhhs: folds
TheCleaner11: calls $30
Poly_Baller: folds
rut69: folds
zawaaa: folds

Flop (Pot : $75.00)

   
Hero : bets $50
TheCleaner11: calls $50

Turn (Pot : $175.00)

   
Hero : bets $120
TheCleaner11: calls $120

River (Pot : $415.00)

   
Hero : checks
TheCleaner11: bets $400

check-shoving is bad but its pretty close between the other 3

I think I slightly prefer check-calling since he could be double floating diamonds and he is capable of value-betting thin with JJ.

i think its much more likely that he shows up with 77 then 9x

but snap call

does he ever vbet a PP if you check river?? i am not saying to fold (snap call obv) but more like i dont think he would bet lets say 44-88 on the river he probably takes the showdown but on that board i think its likely he calls if you bet so imo 3barrel is better. (that is without knowing how theclaner plays).

On April 16 2008 20:40 PoorUser wrote: i think its much more likely that he shows up with 77 then 9x but snap call

ez call

results: i timebanked a little bit bc i was confused by his large bet figuring that since he's a good player he's less likely to be bluffing for such a large river bet in this particular situation vs an unknown (me), But I still paid it off for the times he's vbetting QQ and JJ and since I don't really know how he plays either I guess he might play missed diamonds like this, but he did end up showing up with 77. And Baal I was going to three barrel but we are 150bb's deep to start the hand and if I bet this river I feel like he might shove as a bluff on like a 350ish bet and I'll be put in an extremely annoying situation.