1
 |
fira United States. Jun 05 2014 01:20. Posts 6345 | | |
I think I have this right but I'd like some confirmation:
Say there's $1 in the pot. Someone goes allin for $1, and we have him covered. We'd need 33% equity to make it a break-even call, right? Since we gain $2 when we win, and lose $1 when we lose, we need to win a third of the time to break even.
Kay now I'm pretty sure this is correct. Guess I'll post it for giggles.
|
|
|
1
|
The72o Zimbabwe. Jun 05 2014 01:32. Posts 6112 | | |
No!
It's always 50/50, either you win or you lose. |
|
| A Hard Way to Make an Easy Living | |
|
|
1
| |
seven-teen thousands=
we only come out at night.
Yes, you're right man. Except on the break-even part. It's profitable then.
Fuck em' if they can't take a joke. |
|
| | Last edit: 05/06/2014 01:44 |
|
|
1
| |
And no, this whole concept was mind-blowing to me, I call down tons of shit I shouldn't now hahahhaa..
But seriously, it makes you a better player. Think about it some homey g |
|
|
1
|
fira United States. Jun 05 2014 02:13. Posts 6345 | | |
i had K9c on K864cc facing a pot shove. i called and the guy had 64o. felt like i made a mistake but apparently not according to this wizard math concept |
|
|
1
 |
LemOn[5thF] Czech Republic. Jun 05 2014 04:52. Posts 15163 | | |
it's 33.33^%
more if there's rake to breakeven
seems like you've been calling too much |
| |
|
|
1
| |
just write the formula: if P is the wining frequency (1-P is the losing frequency), you have P*2*(1-rake)+(-1)*(1-P) = EV
the formula grows as P grows, so just look for solutions of P when EV is 0 and you have the break even point
But, yeah, your intuition was right, becouse the solution is aproximately (bet to call)/(total pot after you call) |
|
| ADZ124: why do people put pictures of their child in stars.. its like please help feed my child im a fish i cant play? | |
|
|
|
