Phil Ivey allegedly cheated to win £7.8mln

On June 07 2013 12:50 VanDerMeyde wrote: Show nested quote + On June 07 2013 11:47 devon06atX wrote:   On June 05 2013 19:54 Baalim wrote:   On June 05 2013 15:58 TalentedTom wrote:   On June 05 2013 05:59 Baalim wrote: Its the casinos fault, its not like Ivey brought a rigged deck or something, they gotta pay up Yeah this, they need to take responsibility for their carelessness, its not Iveys fault he found a leak and exploited it.. that's how you make money in the world. If Phil Ivey would have lost money with that deck would they have given him his money back? Yes. you dont really believe that do you

trollface im sure

On June 07 2013 12:50 VanDerMeyde wrote: Show nested quote + On June 07 2013 11:47 devon06atX wrote:   On June 05 2013 19:54 Baalim wrote:   On June 05 2013 15:58 TalentedTom wrote:   On June 05 2013 05:59 Baalim wrote: Its the casinos fault, its not like Ivey brought a rigged deck or something, they gotta pay up Yeah this, they need to take responsibility for their carelessness, its not Iveys fault he found a leak and exploited it.. that's how you make money in the world. If Phil Ivey would have lost money with that deck would they have given him his money back? Yes. you dont really believe that do you

Nah man, clearly not. Thought I'd answer an obvious silly ass question with an equally obvious silly ass answer.

edit - my take on the whole situation? If I could get an edge on an institution that makes it's money by literally swindling it's customers, I'd take it too.

it wasnt a silly question, it was a rethoric question... facepalm

On June 09 2013 06:59 Baalim wrote: it wasnt a silly question, it was a rethoric question... facepalm

I know, I was extremely hung over when I made the 'Yes' comment. So much for being witty eh haha

On June 09 2013 09:56 devon06atX wrote: Show nested quote + On June 09 2013 06:59 Baalim wrote: it wasnt a silly question, it was a rethoric question... facepalm I know, I was extremely hung over when I made the 'Yes' comment. So much for being witty eh haha

blaiming plain stupidity for being hungover is so common, please halp dolan? gooby? anyone? (

i blame all my hangovers on my stupidity

http://www.findcasinobonus.com/blog/2...ey-admits-edge-sorting-at-crockfords/

How come we don't start a thread - "Casinos cheat players to win billions"

because Tom, it's like saying "Oceans are made of salt-water."

I just watched the PAD episode where he is like "I have my rainman moments in baccarat." Anyway I don't see why it's on him, you wouldn't sue the players if your roulette wheel was biased.

He lost the case.

On October 08 2014 14:19 Oly wrote: He lost the case.

retarded legal system, std

http://m.theage.com.au/victoria/femal...d-boy-walks-free-20141009-113hlz.html

Judges and prosecutors vary so much, now imagine if Phil Ivey was a woman. Would he have had a better chance at winning his case?

that article seems irrelevant? a teacher in australia wanted to have sex with (didn't abuse) her 10 year old student and she ends up on the sex offender registry. so if an american professional gambler was actually a woman heshe would have had more credibility in suing a UK casino?

This was probably addressed, but why did he admit to edge sorting? Would the casino be able to prove it in court?

On October 09 2014 09:49 tomson wrote: This was probably addressed, but why did he admit to edge sorting? Would the casino be able to prove it in court?

because not admitting it would be kind of admitting that edge sorting is cheating and I dont think it would be hard at all to prove with video cameras that he was doing it

And justice for all....

i don't know if you people use other sites than LP because i don't so i wouldn't know about this but if you do already sry this is ivey's spot on 60 minutes sports with interview

http://www.pokertube.com/videos/60-mi...on-cheating-at-borgata-and-crockfords

Thanks for the link