1
 |
drone666   Brasil. Sep 07 2012 15:25. Posts 1828 | | | |
|
| Dont listen to anything I say | |
|
|
1
 |
julep   Australia. Sep 07 2012 22:52. Posts 1274 | | |
callling pre is fine.
id be tempted to check turn, given he is aggessive and since i think his range could be quite wide - JThh type hands.
betting is obviously fine tho |
|
|
1
 |
patti   United States. Sep 08 2012 12:52. Posts 550 | | |
Sounds like u got coolered... 140bb deep maybe u can bet size differently but I doubt I'm folding often |
|
|
1
 |
drone666   Brasil. Sep 08 2012 15:22. Posts 1828 | | |
I'm obviously not folding turn or flop, I just couldn't find a spot where 68ss is profitable playing multiway pots vs regs, since this is the best possible flop, and it's not even a great spot equity wise vs a hand that will get in with me
so the question is basically about preflop, because I see people calling this suited conector hands all the time, arguing that it plays good multiways pots
|
|
| Dont listen to anything I say | |
|
|
1
 |
YoMeR   United States. Sep 08 2012 20:38. Posts 12438 | | |
I think your call pre sucks. Id prefer to sqz or fold...as played we flopped the nuts. Let's start shoveling in the monies |
| |
|
|
1
| |
poker is funy o_O i think folding pre is lol bad |
|
|
1
 |
YoMeR   United States. Sep 10 2012 16:55. Posts 12438 | | |
^ can you explain why your standard would to be flat weak hands OOP vs a couple decent players and 1 baddie that's not even a fish? I can see merits of calling here if there's some fish/whale in the hand but vs 3 competent/semi competent opponents we aren't really out playing anyone OOP with a weak hand as this. and hands like this is only really profitable if we are outplaying them often enough to make up for the likely difference in hand strength and positional strength as well.. i just don't see a call here being +ev long term
|
| |
|
|
1
 |
TalentedTom   Canada. Sep 13 2012 17:55. Posts 20070 | | |
| | On September 10 2012 11:35 HeRoS)eNGagE wrote:
poker is funy o_O i think folding pre is lol bad |
I THINK FLATTING PRE AT 100BB STACKS IS NOT SO GOOD |
|
| Our deepest fear is not that we are inadequate. Our deepest fear is that we are powerful beyond measure. It is our light not our darkness that most frightens us and as we let our own lights shine we unconsciously give other people permision to do the same | |
|
|
1
 |
Zalfor   United States. Sep 13 2012 21:58. Posts 2236 | | |
is it just me or is this a fold / squeeze pre? |
|
|
1
 |
Oly   United Kingdom. Sep 16 2012 10:08. Posts 3585 | | |
Totally agree on the fold/sqz pre only. This hand is awful multiway and oop, it has such huge reverse implied odds in a spot like this. If you can't stack off here with a smile then don't call pre, and you can't stack off here with a smile so the hand is clearly a bad call imo. |
|
| Researchers used brain scans to show that when straight men looked at pictures of women in bikinis, areas of the brain that normally light up in anticipation of using tools, like spanners and screwdrivers, were activated. | |
|
|
1
 |
Stroggoz   New Zealand. Sep 16 2012 13:29. Posts 5365 | | |
interesting discussion here on the preflop. There is quite a big divide over weather it's good to play like this preflop, this divide extends to the most skilled players.
i think our implied odds are ok here, the last time i played 100nl, regs didn't know how to fold top pair in 4way pots. And it's quite easy for someone to have an overpair/top pair in a four way pot.
We basically gotta flop two pair+ though if we want to make money, which still makes it an ok call imo. This is because even though we have to fold to a cbet 93% of the time, and we are getting exploited by cbets, we still exploit other people more when we make a good hand.
i don't think reverse implied odds are even much of an issue.
imo, calling pre is marginal. if there was a fish in the pot then calling pre is great.
btw the turn overbet is pretty insane. You'll get much more calls with a smaller bet. |
|
| One of 3 non decent human beings on a site of 5 people with between 2-3 decent human beings | Last edit: 16/09/2012 13:35 |
|
|
1
 |
Shab   United Kingdom. Sep 17 2012 06:44. Posts 22 | | |
mm
you'll flop those strengths of hands very rarely (4%?) and are still unlikely to win a whole stack vs top pairs
board pairs on other cards by river i guess about 18% when you have 2pair
you'll flop a fd (which might not even be good) about 10% and have to play it oop
as an added bonus BB will likely squeeze at least 4% of the time
Calling oop with most likely a worse hand than anyone else isnt gonna be close to justified by that 50c discount
Maybe its true that all the regulars are spewing everywhere with their pairs but i think you're kidding yourself how often you hit those hands and have them both be paid off and still be good by the river
|
|
|
1
 |
AndrewSong   United States. Sep 20 2012 00:25. Posts 2355 | | |
| | On September 13 2012 16:55 TalentedTom wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 10 2012 11:35 HeRoS)eNGagE wrote:
poker is funy o_O i think folding pre is lol bad |
I THINK FLATTING PRE AT 100BB STACKS IS NOT SO GOOD
|
|
|
|
1
 |
TalentedTom   Canada. Sep 24 2012 15:29. Posts 20070 | | |
i also dont like CRing the flop, cause if he shoves we have to call - calling overpot shove with 8 high is kinda bad |
|
| Our deepest fear is not that we are inadequate. Our deepest fear is that we are powerful beyond measure. It is our light not our darkness that most frightens us and as we let our own lights shine we unconsciously give other people permision to do the same | |
|
|
1
 |
MARSHALL28   United States. Sep 29 2012 19:39. Posts 1904 | | |
flatting pre sucks.
after you did it anyways, it's way better to lead than to c/r |
|
|
|