Winning Stats for Tournament Players

I have changed my style a lot over the last year and as a result my stats have changed a lot too. I am curious about the stats of other winning tournament players.

I rather not have guesses, but I rather have actual stats from other winning players.

Sample Size, VPIP, PFR, 3Bet %, bb/100

.. and the important ones I am really looking for ..

Avg. All-In EV %, ..Pre, ..Flop, ..Turn

Thanks,
Rescom

this is going to vary so greatly depending on blind size, stack depth, number of players at the table, how close to the money / other bubbles we are, etc.

overall stats won't be helpful, it's more about adjusting to the situation.

I am just interested to see. Obviously it is dependent on the situation. That is why I wanted total stats so I have a large sample to look at. My stats were very TAG but now they are getting very LAG, but I am accumulating bigger stacks deep and busting more in the middle, etc.

Plus I get bored late so I ask random questions.

None of these qeustions are really relevant and change from table to table blind level to blind level. All you need is common sense and to constiantly calcualate every variable (theres alot)

I don't think anyone would post these anyway :/

stop thinking about poker as an aboslute, in a table full of nits you need to become a maniac, and vise versa etc... the best and most profitable players are the ones who adjust the fastest

just the right decision in the right situation stage,stack,yours cards,position,# players,imagin how they are playing,etc,just make the right decision but you know we can lost a tournament with the right decision.

There is no long term in tournament poker hence no meaningful statistical analysis.

no money in MTTs everyone's solid -- and we'll never see a big enough sample size

This is really very good depending upon other side .

On December 18 2012 17:28 truthspeaker wrote: no money in MTTs everyone's solid -- and we'll never see a big enough sample size

lol wat?

have you seem my girrafes?

Like a lot of people have said. Don't think of it as an absolute. I know what you're gonna say to that: WELL I STILL FIND IT INTERESTING. That's what I always thought when I got those kinds of answers. It just.. It just really stops you from actually thinking about the real way to look at poker. Granted, I'm not that good, but I think if I had stopped looking at it in ways of absolutes I would've evolved a hell of a lot quicker.