NMcNasty   United States. Jul 21 2012 12:19. Posts 2041
Bane was a menacing and formidable villain, but overall the movie was just OK. My opinion that the Burton Batmans > Nolan's was solidified.
1
palak   United States. Jul 21 2012 14:07. Posts 4601
2nd best batman movie imo, Dark Knight is going to be impossible to top. I think ppl went into this movie with expectations that couldn't possibly be met...To me all of Nolans batman movies are much better than burtons. Burtons are by far the most influential comic book movies in history, but when taken as actual movies and the changes they made to the Batman mythos they are OK movies at best.
Nolans movies made changes to character backgrounds but generally held the overall motivations/actions of the characters with the except of Two-Face.
dont tap the glass...im about ready to take a fucking hammer to the aquarium
1
TheHuHu3   United States. Jul 21 2012 14:57. Posts 5544
On July 21 2012 11:19 NMcNasty wrote:
Bane was a menacing and formidable villain, but overall the movie was just OK. My opinion that the Burton Batmans > Nolan's was solidified.
bane should at least be 6'2. tom hardy is hardly 5'10 ffs. bale is even taller than the guy, we were tricked with some snazzy camera angles. b.s. i want my money baaack
Yeah I guess everyone expected 3rd movie to surpass the 2nd one .. which seems impossible to me. Still the movie was sick good and definetly one of the few movies this years thats actually worth watching.
patti   United States. Jul 29 2012 22:01. Posts 550
The second one was the best. Rises seemed so shallow in plot and character development. Also I had a hard time really letting myself go and immersing myself into the movie considering the Colorado incident. I was constantly on edge and it was in the back of my mind for the entire duration.
1
LikeASet   United States. Jul 29 2012 22:32. Posts 2113
wow if Vin Diesel was bane that would be fucking tilting, I hope you guys are trolling. Actual Bane was a motherfucking bad ass beast