10/20 get c/r on river - Page 2

minraise river imo

first instinct is to shove, then realized u can call. then realized shoving still better. if 9 pairs instead of 7its a slamdunk call, as is its a slamdunk shove.

On July 19 2012 06:17 idonklife wrote: minraise river imo

this might be very good too but i think shoving is better vs a random unknown.

On July 19 2012 05:05 handbanana21 wrote: Jesus i hate your undertones... I cant believe anyone even bothered to give you insight.

what i said wrong?

...i've been giving everybody else tons of insight in like every thread.

i'll find out what he had in 3 hrs, i think if it shows 97 or 67 i need to re-think how ppl r playing in these games cuz atm i really don't think those hands combined will show up anywhere close to 28% of the time. interested to know what tom thinks....

You are not alone Marshall, seens like a puke fold to me =/

On July 19 2012 14:27 MARSHALL28 wrote: i'll find out what he had in 3 hrs, i think if it shows 97 or 67 i need to re-think how ppl r playing in these games cuz atm i really don't think those hands combined will show up anywhere close to 28% of the time.

Also JTs, A7s, 56s, 87s, and utg raises with other random suited sevens is really not that uncommon.

So this isn't live poker? Was confused by the HH a little but then you said anonymous tables so unless people are playing with bags over their heads I'll just assume it's online. Obviously the random spazz-out factor is much smaller online compared to live but I would still call here. Even if he's just got AT/AJ or something he could be calling down then decides you have to fold your whole range if he raises your river bet bc he looks so strong. Idk about shoving versus calling argument but I would definitely look him up.

I have a boat.

ALL-IN

I'm actually a big fan of sizing my river bet smaller in this hand, esp w given action. I'm never folding. Ever. Ever never ever.

seriously you folded?

this has to be a terrible fold, I'm not a big fan of raising but you have to snap call this all day long, this line makes a lot more sense with A7 than it does with AA/99/77

oh actually it could be 99, thought flop was A98

either way I still call

On July 20 2012 01:34 Fayth wrote: seriously you folded? this has to be a terrible fold, I'm not a big fan of raising but you have to snap call this all day long, this line makes a lot more sense with A7 than it does with AA/99/77 oh actually it could be 99, thought flop was A98 either way I still call

yes i folded. tell me, hows he bluffing? and if he's value raising worse, give a reasonable thought process for how to get to this point w/ a worse hand for value.

On July 19 2012 20:26 JonnyCosMo wrote: I'm actually a big fan of sizing my river bet smaller in this hand, esp w given action.

yep, i agree, that was a mistake i made.

On July 20 2012 01:59 MARSHALL28 wrote: Show nested quote + On July 20 2012 01:34 Fayth wrote: seriously you folded? this has to be a terrible fold, I'm not a big fan of raising but you have to snap call this all day long, this line makes a lot more sense with A7 than it does with AA/99/77 oh actually it could be 99, thought flop was A98 either way I still call yes i folded. tell me, hows he bluffing? and if he's value raising worse, give a reasonable thought process for how to get to this point w/ a worse hand for value.

Notsureifsrs.jpg

I dont understand how you give some unknown this much credit here, I mean you are losing to 6 combos of 99/AA and even that he wont play like this 100% on the flop/turn so its like ~4.5 and we are getting better than 2:1, meaning we need to like A combo of something we beat and especially vs some unknown who can be doing god knows what I think its a very bad fold. I disagree with others about this being a raise tho.

headexplode

On July 19 2012 14:27 MARSHALL28 wrote: i'll find out what he had in 3 hrs, i think if it shows 97 or 67 i need to re-think how ppl r playing in these games cuz atm i really don't think those hands combined will show up anywhere close to 28% of the time. interested to know what tom thinks....

longest 3 hours ever

this is how online is played these days? i can just c/r turn anything into a bluff on riv and any one of you folds the tip top of your range? need to start playing on stars again if this is the case --;

On July 22 2012 20:45 n0rthf4ce wrote: this is how online is played these days? i can just c/r turn anything into a bluff on riv and any one of you folds the tip top of your range? need to start playing on stars again if this is the case --;

Lol if u seriously wanna jam this river all in. Come and play me anytime.

On July 22 2012 20:32 player999 wrote: Show nested quote + On July 19 2012 14:27 MARSHALL28 wrote: i'll find out what he had in 3 hrs, i think if it shows 97 or 67 i need to re-think how ppl r playing in these games cuz atm i really don't think those hands combined will show up anywhere close to 28% of the time. interested to know what tom thinks.... longest 3 hours ever

Dude had 99.