2012 London Olympics - Page 10

- US Navy base in California. After many complaints they changed (or are changing right now) the shape of the bases. Of course, it was just a mistake that the architects made involuntarily. As we know architects rarely know the plan of the building and would never notice the shape of the swastika in all the monts of construction of the bases.





RIP Russo

While I appreciate the effort you put in, D_Smart, and I like reading about this kind of stuff, I also have a problem with it.
All of these conspiracies, videos documents usually stay at one general level: clues. speculation.
I listened to the Rik Clay interview, the guy keeps going on about how there's the number 11 everywhere etc. Then the music videos, with all the signs in it. There seems a lot of this 'evidence', clues that there are secrets going on, but there is no big picture. Has there been any real proof of intentions of these 'evil' guys? Is it just 1 society, are there many splinter groups? Seems that the 'research' is diversifying, if anything.

Also, the sheer number of links that are made by the theorists are easily accounted for when you look at everything that is a 'clue':
- societies, groups, bilderberg, illuminati, skull&bones, nwo, scientology
- numbers 11, 9, 7, 3
- triangles, stars, piramids, pillars, checkerboards
- any reference to any traditional religion
- goats, cats, butterflies
- dolls, puppets, leopard skin, mind control, holograms(lol), celebrity deaths
- crop circles, chemtrails
- chakras, reiki and other vague religions
- ufos, aliens, xenu
- terrorist attacks, government control (laws), locator chips, kony2012, speech-jamming guns, robot parts on humans, unmanned drones

See where i'm going? This doesn't look much like 1 theory, right? There's nothing wrong with questioning everything but so far it's just a big mess of ideas, theories and some clues.

the amount of evidence and information available is 100 000 times more than what you have just found. So instead of looking at the details and deeper levels of it it's better to first look at the basic concept and proof of the existence of New World Order and the Illuminati. If I had spent the first 5 pages explaining the illuminati and the proof there would be no room for the Olympic 2012 connection. It's just too much information. So i just explained in a few sentences who the illuminati are and connected it to the Olympics. So watch a few documentaries on the illuminati and New world order and then read the thread again and you will understand the significance of it all. That is the reason I told Mortensen not speak about the number 11 and other details - it just brings more confusion in such a deep and complex topic. I haven't watched illuminati documentaries in a long time so I've forgotten which ones are the best but try with this one:



after that research the given facts about Bavaria and the start of the illuminati in the 18th century

after that watch



then read the thread and tell me what you think.

It would also be nice if you didn't act like you have 100 000 times the knowledge that the rest of us have. You probably have read/seen more than any of us, but you talk to the rest like you already have all the answers. I have watched a few documentaries on the illuminati and the NWO. Also, I would like to know what you think constitutes proof. Proof isn't dependent on amounts of information, it's not about being deep and complex. I wonder how one could prove the Illuminati exist in 5 pages, but not in 1 page. Sorry to react so bluntly, but your last post sounds like your part of a secret society of conspiracy theorists.

Edit: I'll watch that first one later, I watched that second one. Some of it is interesting. Some of it made me lol: (Michael Jackson dancing) "Michael is making occult gestures which only occult members understand. He's saying something that has been censored". C'mon.

On May 03 2012 05:04 aseq wrote: It would also be nice if you didn't act like you have 100 000 times the knowledge that the rest of us have. You probably have read/seen more than any of us, but you talk to the rest like you already have all the answers. I have watched a few documentaries on the illuminati and the NWO. Also, I would like to know what you think constitutes proof. Proof isn't dependent on amounts of information, it's not about being deep and complex. I wonder how one could prove the Illuminati exist in 5 pages, but not in 1 page. Sorry to react so bluntly, but your last post sounds like your part of a secret society of conspiracy theorists. Edit: I'll watch that first one later, I watched that second one. Some of it is interesting. Some of it made me lol: (Michael Jackson dancing) "Michael is making occult gestures which only occult members understand. He's saying something that has been censored". C'mon.

I don't act like you say I act I am just saying that the amount of information out there (not in me) is so much that is hard to compile. The first post I wrote was HUGE. I risked losing audience and as I can see many/most people replying have not read all of that post so I add in later posts. And I don't like it when someone thinks that because I have posted a video and two pictures about something I think that this is what proves it. I am just presenting information quickly. The most interesting bits and pieces. For the most detailed (and for most uninteresting) proof I have posted documentaries who present information in an interesting way without getting too boring as it would if I had written 5 pages of text. I have put enough information in this thread for someone to get the basic idea - much higher risk of something bad happening in the 2012 Olympics. For more information - find documentaries and research the given facts/speculation and make up your own mind. If someone thinks it's wrong to warn people of a possible disaster than he has to check the doctor immediately.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/B-25_Empire_State_Building_crash

Why didnt Empire State building collapse ?

On May 03 2012 06:19 VanDerMeyde wrote: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/B-25_Empire_State_Building_crash Why didnt Empire State building collapse ?

Very nice find, I have never heard about that accident. It's like the perfect example of what happens when a plane comes crashing into a building. There was an Amsterdam plane crash into a civil building that is much less strong than the Twin Towers and it was still standing after the crash. But let's not go to 9/11, it's been discussed as much as anything else.

i approve of this thread. ignore the trolls d_smart_s.

palak, how much do you think the rothschild family networth is?

On May 03 2012 04:50 D_smart_S wrote: the amount of evidence and information available is 100 000 times more than what you have just found. So instead of looking at the details and deeper levels of it it's better to first look at the basic concept and proof of the existence of New World Order and the Illuminati. If I had spent the first 5 pages explaining the illuminati and the proof there would be no room for the Olympic 2012 connection..

In other words, I could provide proof, but i wont and you should just take my word for it.

Coincidences in images are no evidence at all, you can see any conspiracy theory backed that way and its useless, its easy to manipulate and holds no value.

The only true evidence you present is the Major mentioning Zion however the source is not valid, its a conspiracy theory site, it isnt in a newspaper or a video, so i call BS.

There is no denying in the existence of secret societies, many arent even that secret and some are even documented in video (bindenberg group) but theres a big gap between knowing they exist than knowing they are that powerful and with that much control, quite frankly i dont think they have that control on the system, they are just gears of a system with very little control.

I dont see a logical reason or evidence that ponts to an attack in 2012 olympics but i guess we will find out who was right very soon.

btw that illuminati game is sick, more info on it?

On May 03 2012 15:14 Baalim wrote: Coincidences in images are no evidence at all, you can see any conspiracy theory backed that way and its useless, its easy to manipulate and holds no value. The only true evidence you present is the Major mentioning Zion however the source is not valid, its a conspiracy theory site, it isnt in a newspaper or a video, so i call BS. There is no denying in the existence of secret societies, many arent even that secret and some are even documented in video (bindenberg group) but theres a big gap between knowing they exist than knowing they are that powerful and with that much control, quite frankly i dont think they have that control on the system, they are just gears of a system with very little control. I dont see a logical reason or evidence that ponts to an attack in 2012 olympics but i guess we will find out who was right very soon.

It's Bilderberg group, not bindenberg.

About the card game - there was a video where Steve Jackson, the creator explained in court or some other similar setting details about the game. I know that the FBI raided him once but there isn't a whole lot of information on the subject. Youtube has some good compilations of cards and events that have happened or might happen in the future. It's sick how "in your face" they make it and still nobody talks about it.

- The Matrix (1999)

On May 04 2012 01:07 D_smart_S wrote: - The Matrix (1999)

I dont think you realize that kind of picture instead of adding to your argument, takes a lot away from it

as I said on several occasions I don't consider this as evidence. It's a clue. That's how the Illuminati play their game. They love subliminals to give a fair chance to people and also to make their game more amusing. There is no evidence before a crime, just clues. Just like their card game. These clues are like puzzle pieces. Individually, they don't mean much but when put together you start seeing the bigger picture.

On May 04 2012 01:07 D_smart_S wrote: - The Matrix (1999)

First off, Baal just pointed out how everything you've presented has been 100% speculation. You then post this image. Way to prove his exact point (That's usually a figure of speech, but in this case, you did just prove his EXACT point). Secondly, having just seen this scene...let me just post this picture as it appears in the film: The shot of the passport is less than one-third of a second long and it appears upside down in the shot. That is one hell of a game Illuminati is playing. Making subliminal messages so "in your face" (d_smart's words) you have less than a third of a second to take a screen shot and flip it 180 degrees in order to "see" the connection. Seriously, look for yourself. It's around the 18 - 19 minute mark when Neo is first being interrogated by Agent Smith. But I'll give you this, It does say 9/11/01.

Look if 13k people die in an act of terrorism during the olympics- I'll give credit where credit is due. But you're not evening manning up to the argument you're composing. You're saying this might happen and you're not even willing to bet money that it happens - no matter the odds. At the same time you're saying, I'm just looking out for LPers. Like I said before, who listens to you that has the money to be at the Olympics? (Hint: No one.) If you feel it's worth it to present this argument, do it and then present empirical evidence when asked to do so, or shut the fuck up and leave it at being an opinion based upon speculation.

You really don't get the goal of the thread and don't read/understand what I write. Read my last post, I am done replying to people who want me to bet money on people dying and don't understand why I am not doing it or people who can't understand that by saying "these are clues" I don't mean "this is evidence". Seriously, just learn to understand what is written before posting anything, zeppy. It's like I am pointing at a bird and saying "hey that's a bird" and someone replies "it's not a plane, idiot, why do you think it's a plane? Prove it!"

On May 04 2012 01:07 D_smart_S wrote: - The Matrix (1999)

who needs the rofl thread when i have this thread