back to back hands, this one came second.

this one first:
Submitted by : ggplz

PokerStars Game #16913868214: Hold'em No Limit ($0.50/$1.00) - 2008/04/22 - 12:07:42 (ET)
Table 'Jihlava III' 6-max Seat #1 is the button
Seat 1: JohnDark ($255.10 in chips)
Seat 2: udinoemie ($45.50 in chips)
Seat 3: ggplz ($162.05 in chips)
Seat 4: essex236 ($97.90 in chips)
udinoemie: posts small blind $0.50
ggplz : posts big blind $1

Holecards
Dealt to ggplz
essex236: calls $1
JohnDark: raises $4 to $5
udinoemie: folds
ggplz : raises $10 to $15
essex236: folds
JohnDark: calls $10

Flop (Pot : $31.50)

   
ggplz : bets $21
JohnDark: calls $21

Turn (Pot : $73.50)

   
ggplz : checks
JohnDark: checks

River (Pot : $73.50)

   
ggplz : checks
JohnDark: bets $33
ggplz : raises $93.05 to $126.05 and is all-in
JohnDark said, "wow"
essex236 leaves the table
JohnDark said, "sick bluff"
JohnDark: folds
ggplz collected $137.50 from pot
ggplz : doesn't show hand

Summary
Total pot $139.50 | Rake $2
Board  
Seat 1: JohnDark (button) folded on the River
Seat 2: udinoemie (small blind) folded before Flop
Seat 3: ggplz (big blind) collected ($137.50)
Seat 4: essex236 folded before Flop

You, tbh, pretty fucking owned him :C

i dont like my play here, thoughts on river? maybee $54 bet? note stacks

now I'm really confused I thought u said u haid AKss on the last one

given the history river could be ok but in general a 60ish bet would be better

On April 22 2008 14:52 lebowski wrote: now I'm really confused I thought u said u haid AKss on the last one

wat

ggplz said, "i had QQ"

On April 22 2008 14:52 lebowski wrote: now I'm really confused I thought u said u haid AKss on the last one

yeah i did but it doesnt matter he didnt see it

On April 22 2008 14:56 Trey wrote: Show nested quote + On April 22 2008 14:52 lebowski wrote: now I'm really confused I thought u said u haid AKss on the last one wat ggplz said, "i had QQ"

http://www.liquidpoker.net/h/430013

On April 22 2008 14:56 ggplz wrote: Show nested quote + On April 22 2008 14:52 lebowski wrote: now I'm really confused I thought u said u haid AKss on the last one yeah i did but it doesnt matter he didnt see it

lol ok, it's just that u posted it here as QQ again :/

yeah, it doesnt matter though.. he didnt see it so how does it affect the dynamic of playing two hands in a row in this manner?
all it shows is that he suspects i bluffed him.. so the question becomes do i shove river to make it look bluffy.. orrrrrrrr do i bet/call ? idk im thinking i dont want to close the action here and try give him a chance to bluff it

oh

nah he wouldn't bluff it I think after the flop action
bet call is probably better and if he's a thinking player and considers you decent he'll know that a shove can't really be a bluff here after the previous hand because it would be kind of an awsome level or suicidal.
If he was fishy/weekend warrior shove would work great a lot of times even with second pair types of hands
so here I believe a moderate bet is better