sigh... right call.. never hit.

Blog from september ,

So here it is:
You give me BR5000. The situation is a "stake" I guess as is the common expression.
I will give you 50% of my profits including bonuses (minus the 70k FPPs on the $1600 bonus value scale that I currently possess)
I will do this until you have made $10,000 in profit
So basically you risk $2,500 to likely recoup $12,500


Post october graph and mid nov ,
How much would have made your baker ?
Broke even?

You never discuss in the hh section , even if plo reg
Are writting in your hh , you never answer ,
Like you are on the top of your game full of ego..

You played micro game for 10 years , no wonder you are
A whinner begging for stake

Is that like a long Haiku bro?

Decent.

bad thing is you only have one nut out the 6 and someone can easily have a dominant straight draw to yours (esp the guy betting is more likely to have it than usual since it is completely rainbow). You had good equity here in this hand though that's for sure

On November 13 2014 21:09 ifeelsleepy wrote: Blog from september , So here it is: You give me BR5000. The situation is a "stake" I guess as is the common expression. I will give you 50% of my profits including bonuses (minus the 70k FPPs on the $1600 bonus value scale that I currently possess) I will do this until you have made $10,000 in profit So basically you risk $2,500 to likely recoup $12,500 Post october graph and mid nov , How much would have made your baker ? Broke even? You never discuss in the hh section , even if plo reg Are writting in your hh , you never answer , Like you are on the top of your game full of ego.. You played micro game for 10 years , no wonder you are A whinner begging for stake

1. I do reply to peoples comments on my hands.
2. I have no problem posting the graph, it's not gone well so far, but my coach is happy with my game and we are continually working on things. He told me flat out that my game will get worse before it gets better as we fix leaks and what not. It takes time to learn how to properly play different spots.
3. I have never once acted like I'm a perfect player. I regularly call myself a noob and am very aware there is much to learn and it's hard work to get there.

What I bitch about, is that it seems over a long duration of hands at PLO50 and PLO25 roughly 500k I've ran quite poorly in 3-bet and 4-bet pots. Largely in terms of just how the flop equities are panning out. So there is some frustration there partly because I tell myself it must be my own fault I must be butchering these hands to not be doing very well - aka there must be tons of leaks to fix. However, it's really difficult to separate out what is just variance and what theoretically makes perfect sense to do - particularly when you're getting flop crushed and you start to lose confidence in how you play those spots even if math tells you what boards you should be c-betting a huge % of the time and that you should be getting folds/hold/good equity spots. At least that's how it is for me. It makes you question everything and whether you're playing the spots well but with small samples of only a few thousand 3-bet hands it's difficult to really know. Time and work are needed. That's it that's all.

Also, the fact that we're paying 10pt/bb rake doesn't make it much fun because you really have to crush and destroy ZOOM PLO50 to actually win there. There have been many 2p2 threads about it and about the winrates and how tough that game actually is to beat. 100PLO is actually an easier game because of the rake difference, not even kidding.