https://www.liquidpoker.net/


LP international Poland    Contact            Users: 358 Active, 0 Logged in - Time: 15:33

Show hand : 1038279

New to LiquidPoker? Register here for free!
Back Submit a hand   

Handnr: 1038279
Submitted by : LemOn[5thF]

PokerStars Hand #118832043443: Holdem No Limit ($0.08/$0.16 USD) - 2014/07/16 17:32:16 CET [2014/07/16 11:32:16 ET]
Table Rigel III 6-max Seat #1 is the button
Seat 1: haien99 ($16 in chips)
Seat 5: DoC.LemOn ($20.69 in chips)
haien99: posts small blind $0.08
DoC.LemOn: posts big blind $0.16

Holecards
Dealt to DoC.LemOn TcJc
haien99: raises $0.32 to $0.48
DoC.LemOn: calls $0.32

Flop (Pot : $0.96)

   TdTh2s
DoC.LemOn: checks
haien99: checks

Turn (Pot : $0.96)

   TdTh2sKh
DoC.LemOn: checks
haien99: bets $0.46
DoC.LemOn: raises $1.14 to $1.60
haien99: calls $1.14

River (Pot : $4.16)

   TdTh2sKhAc
DoC.LemOn: bets $3.04
haien99: raises $10.88 to $13.92 and is all-in
DoC.LemOn: folds
Uncalled bet ($10.88) returned to haien99
haien99 collected $9.78 from pot
haien99: doesnt show hand

Summary
Total pot $10.24 | Rake $0.46
Board  TdTh2sKhAc
Seat 1: haien99 (button) (small blind) collected ($9.78)
Seat 5: DoC.LemOn (big blind) folded on the River

Also want to share your poker hands? Register an account for free

Comments

Forum Index > pokerhands
LemOn[5thF]   Czech Republic. Jul 16 2014 11:42. Posts 15163

unsure about turn
besides that I want to check there
guys a nit 50% vpip only pretty straightforward so far - vs someone good I might have 2 streets vs bluffs doubt vs 6max straighfowad guys that I have that so thought just about max value from Kx (qj)

ima look at my range later

Facebook Twitter
93% Sure! Last edit: 16/07/2014 11:48

LemOn[5thF]   Czech Republic. Jul 16 2014 12:32. Posts 15163

id call pre sth like this

3b Axo Kxo and suited crap(edges of the range highlited) expect high fold to 3b


on turn

got fh+quads 2.6%
tripps 11.4%
pair 26.1%
A hi 20.7%
nothing 40% of the time

So against someone good I don't think I can have a raising range here really if I check call pairs+A highs? Makes me super vulnerable on the river - better to cc everything and have a cr bluff range+value range on river innit.

His size is so small I need to call some Qhigh as well or he autoprofits thoor I rly wanna bluff some.


Now against a tight player that won't follow up on the river...meh
I mean whatever. Can get away with crappy ranges and him checking back QJ Kx and some pairs he xed back on flop on river is a strong possibility

93% Sure! Last edit: 16/07/2014 12:39

LemOn[5thF]   Czech Republic. Jul 16 2014 12:35. Posts 15163

maybe even leading the turn altho super bad vs smn good might be optimal vs this dude?
I wouldn't mind that at all actually

93% Sure! Last edit: 16/07/2014 12:36

Nitewin   United States. Jul 16 2014 13:38. Posts 1539

Thinking too deep for this level imo. Unless he's a complete robot or you have him read 100%, people turn up with worse here often. Maybe AK or worse Tx jams, or random bluffs. I don't know if I'm folding here but maybe you know the games better. Either way, very disciplined!


LemOn[5thF]   Czech Republic. Jul 16 2014 13:54. Posts 15163

He a nit HU
I mean I was minraising 100% he still has 50vpip
ppl like that are usually nitty. he snap shoved the river too I mean...
That was the thing I forgot after a month long dota break
ridiculous explo folds in spot when tight people hardly bluff are the way to beat these games

93% Sure! Last edit: 16/07/2014 13:58

ggplz   Sweden. Jul 16 2014 15:24. Posts 16784

I'm leading turn without a strong reason to check e.g. he's betting extremely often and will tilt call a checkraise wide, potentially much larger depending on his competency/tiltfactor. As played your checkraise is small, go at least $2*.

Folding river as played. Not even worth second guessing if a 16nl nit is "getting creative". Might check/call river pretty often depending on gameflow/opponent.

Also, hows the rake playing 16nl hu vs nits? Not an opponent you should be playing if you should be playing HU at all on these stakes.

if poker is dangerous to them i would rank sports betting as a Kodiak grizzly bear who smells blood after you just threw a javelin into his cub - RaiNKhANLast edit: 16/07/2014 15:28

LemOn[5thF]   Czech Republic. Jul 16 2014 16:32. Posts 15163

Meh I got like 2bb/100 hu there
like 30% of my normal winrate I guess.
still fish join more on these tables innit, increasing my ev 6max
vs nits I should breakeven at least hu when they are this tight.

guess I should stop playing those spewy but not retarded guys that actually play somewhat to decent stats theory wise at least. But...fun and I learn that way even against smn bad hu

93% Sure! Last edit: 16/07/2014 16:34

Spitfiree   Bulgaria. Jul 16 2014 16:41. Posts 9634


  On July 16 2014 14:24 ggplz wrote:
I'm leading turn without a strong reason to check e.g. he's betting extremely often and will tilt call a checkraise wide, potentially much larger depending on his competency/tiltfactor. As played your checkraise is small, go at least $2*.

Folding river as played. Not even worth second guessing if a 16nl nit is "getting creative". Might check/call river pretty often depending on gameflow/opponent.

Also, hows the rake playing 16nl hu vs nits? Not an opponent you should be playing if you should be playing HU at all on these stakes.



+1


LemOn[5thF]   Czech Republic. Jul 16 2014 17:06. Posts 15163

what's your reasoning for leading

93% Sure!  

Spitfiree   Bulgaria. Jul 16 2014 17:30. Posts 9634

If he really is a nit, at this point Kh hits his range, while he bets all his Kxes ( at least im guessing so ) he s checking behind all the semi bluffs which he s not folding, a lot of backdoors opened up on the turn. I don't see a reason to check another street vs a nit tbh, all you could do is potentially lose value. Plus if you c/r It kind of turns your hand face up... not that it matters on 16nl i guess.. i dont think i've seen more than 2-3 people that have decent hand reading abilities

The way he played the hand though, he probably has you beat on all streets Only thing that would actually make me take the timebank is that you said he instantly shoved river, I really don't like folding decent hands vs instant decisions except vs nits and something tells me you don't have a sample big enough to define him as a nit for sure

P.S. there s a big difference if he is a passive or an agressive nit, if passive i might even lead flop

 Last edit: 16/07/2014 17:34

johnmagi   Norway. Jul 16 2014 17:47. Posts 1424

just bet bet bet, no need to keep the pot small with a nice hand


ggplz   Sweden. Jul 16 2014 17:56. Posts 16784


  On July 16 2014 16:06 LemOn[5thF] wrote:
what's your reasoning for leading



1. You have a strong hand and money needs to go in somehow. That alone is such a significant factor at low stakes as you need to bet and not be trappy.
2. Lots of draws just opened up that you can get value from but also need to protect from. You can't let people check it back twice when that turn hits or you end up unhappily calling river bets/raises on Xh/A/Q/J/K rivers. Thats a lot of rivers, like 40% or something.
3. It allows him to make a larger raise and potentially stack off whereas a nit is purely calling turn checkraises there like 99% of the time with his value hands.
4. You rep a wide range, are less likely to have a K or a T thus more likely get called or raised wider especially HU
5. Image / difficulty showing down frustrating him

if poker is dangerous to them i would rank sports betting as a Kodiak grizzly bear who smells blood after you just threw a javelin into his cub - RaiNKhANLast edit: 16/07/2014 17:58

 

All hands submitted by LemOn[5thF]:






Poker Streams

















Copyright © 2024. LiquidPoker.net All Rights Reserved
Contact Advertise Sitemap