PokerStars Zoom Hand #110589873711: Holdem No Limit ($0.01/$0.02) - 2014/01/22 23:56:17 ET
Table Halley 6-max Seat #1 is the button
Seat 1: CENTTURY ($4.28 in chips)
Seat 2: jamming19 ($3.73 in chips)
Seat 3: SoHzn ($1.76 in chips)
Seat 4: cetbyn ($3.50 in chips)
Seat 5: astrid0710 ($6.24 in chips)
Seat 6: rnnmorales ($1.42 in chips)
jamming19: posts small blind $0.01
SoHzn: posts big blind $0.02
Holecards(Odds)
Dealt to SoHzn 
cetbyn: raises $0.06 to $0.08
astrid0710: calls $0.08
rnnmorales: folds
CENTTURY: folds
jamming19: folds
SoHzn: raises $0.26 to $0.34
cetbyn: calls $0.26
astrid0710: folds
Flop(Odds) (Pot : $0.77)
SoHzn: bets $0.36
cetbyn: raises $2.80 to $3.16 and is all-in
SoHzn: calls $1.06 and is all-in
Uncalled bet ($1.74) returned to cetbyn
Turn(Odds) (Pot : $3.61)
River (Pot : $3.61)
Showdown
SoHzn: shows (two pair, Queens and Deuces)
cetbyn: shows 
(two pair, Jacks and Deuces)
SoHzn collected $3.48 from pot
Summary
Total pot $3.61 | Rake $0.13
Board
Seat 1: CENTTURY (button) folded before Flop (didnt bet)
Seat 2: jamming19 (small blind) folded before Flop
Seat 3: SoHzn (big blind) showed and won ($3.48) with two pair, Queens and Deuces
Seat 4: cetbyn showed and lost with two pair, Jacks and Deuces
Seat 5: astrid0710 folded before Flop
Seat 6: rnnmorales folded before Flop (didnt bet)
1
|
1
 |
Trav94 Canada. Jan 23 2014 00:54. Posts 1785 | | |
gj gj
probably should keep yourself topped up to 100bbs though |
|
| | Last edit: 23/01/2014 00:55 |
|
|
1
| |
Was writing series of questions,but the site (or my internet) crashed.
Was my play +ev play? because I felt like I should have folded my hand at the point he all-ined me after my value bet. |
|
|
1
|
Trav94 Canada. Jan 23 2014 00:57. Posts 1785 | | |
Never ever folding here. You played this perfectly. You could cbet flop bigger though. Like .50c |
|
|
1
 |
punix Germany. Jan 23 2014 03:26. Posts 406 | | |
but what if he had a smaller pocket pair.
lets say jacks, would u still call? |
|
|
1
 |
jantje123 Netherlands. Jan 23 2014 03:47. Posts 3787 | | |
| | On January 23 2014 02:26 punix wrote:
but what if he had a smaller pocket pair.
lets say jacks, would u still call? |
Yep still easy call |
|
|
1
|
Trav94 Canada. Jan 23 2014 05:24. Posts 1785 | | |
| | On January 23 2014 02:26 punix wrote:
but what if he had a smaller pocket pair.
lets say jacks, would u still call? |
All day |
|
|
1
|
tooker . Jan 23 2014 07:00. Posts 470 | | |
bet size is fine considering whats left behind and the pot on the turn when called. |
|
|
1
 |
Almebeast Sweden. Jan 23 2014 09:42. Posts 797 | | |
wp. But you shouldn't even be considering folding here, you should be super happy!
This is a dream flop for a pocket pair. If you 3bet a pp and don't want to get all-in on this flop, then you shouldn't 3bet that pp.
|
|
| After all is said and done, more is said than done. | |
|
|
1
| |
| | On January 23 2014 06:00 tooker wrote:
bet size is fine considering whats left behind and the pot on the turn when called. |
|
|
|
1
 |
el_tilon Canada. Jan 23 2014 15:21. Posts 296 | | |
You should bet big in these stakes, 3/4 of the pot |
| |
|
|
1
| |
| | On January 23 2014 02:26 punix wrote:
but what if he had a smaller pocket pair.
lets say jacks, would u still call? |
Not sure if serious but if you are
Tell us your reasoning for playing QQ this way and not JJ
|
|
|
1
|
punix Germany. Jan 23 2014 18:45. Posts 406 | | |
ye at some point i would be too scared that he just has a bigger pp
why should he jam otherwise on flop either because he has connected with that flop (which is unlikely) or because he holds also a pp and now is the question who has the bigger pp |
|
|
1
 |
YoMeR United States. Jan 23 2014 20:38. Posts 12435 | | |
| | On January 23 2014 17:45 punix wrote:
ye at some point i would be too scared that he just has a bigger pp
why should he jam otherwise on flop either because he has connected with that flop (which is unlikely) or because he holds also a pp and now is the question who has the bigger pp |
u need to be thinking range vs range not what exact 2 cards he's holding....it's impossible to play that way unless you have some kinda sick talent/dynamic/read/history etc etc and even then still not more optimal than range vs range in most cases. |
| |
|
|
1
|
punix Germany. Jan 24 2014 04:35. Posts 406 | | |
but he raises utg
so imo his range would be quite broadway and pp (especially higher pp) heavy
then i still would be up against most of his range on this flop since it contains alot more broadway connecters than pp's but when he shoves there i would narrow his range to almost only pp especially high pp there and evenmore regarding the fact that this is micros and ppl are rarely bluffing especially when the reraise. |
|
|
|
